jinnantonnixx Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 (edited) This morning, I downloaded a technical paper from Microsoft. http://download.microsoft.com/download/4/4/C/44CDEF0E-7924-4787-A56A-16261691ACE3/Microsoft_Security_Intelligence_Report_Volume_19_A_Profile_Of_A_Persistent_Adversary_English.pdf I started reading it and pretty soon I thought that my eyes were failing. No, my eyes are fine. They'd published a document using light grey text on a white background. WTF? Legibility is everything in publishing, and this just blows. I had to Crtl-A to select-all to read the stupid thing. This trend is really beginning to annoy me. This is a must-read for trendy web publishers. https://backchannel.com/how-the-web-became-unreadable-a781ddc711b6#.yd7ngexr1 Edited November 3, 2016 by jinnantonnixx
jinnantonnixx Posted November 3, 2016 Author Posted November 3, 2016 (edited) That's perfectly readable here? Admittedly, it's better full screen than a smallish window which I originally used. However, it's a strain on my screen in my lighting. I wish that they'd used black text. No excuses, it should be more legible. Edited November 3, 2016 by jinnantonnixx
elsiegee40 Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 There's been something recently about this trend - the failure to have enough contrast between the text and the background does make it hard for many to read. Apparently Apple's own wisdom on the subject of getting it right fails to meet the standards that it recommends
Arthur Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 The text in the PDF looks dark grey to me and perfectly legible. 1
Lonix Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 That's perfectly readable here? Same. I can't see any issues at all. 1
jinnantonnixx Posted November 3, 2016 Author Posted November 3, 2016 What is this? You're all supposed to agree with me!
sted Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 What is this? You're all supposed to agree with me! its not the clearest thing ive ever read and id prefer it in straight b&w but i can read it is that closer?
jinnantonnixx Posted November 3, 2016 Author Posted November 3, 2016 There's been something recently about this trend - the failure to have enough contrast between the text and the background does make it hard for many to read. Apparently Apple's own wisdom on the subject of getting it right fails to meet the standards that it recommends That's right. If your office lighting is good and your screens are well calibrated, you might be able to read the documents as the designers intended. I'll re-post my link to this trend in case it was missed. https://backchannel.com/how-the-web-became-unreadable-a781ddc711b6#.yd7ngexr1
bald_pig Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 It might be worth checking your monitor settings?
jinnantonnixx Posted November 3, 2016 Author Posted November 3, 2016 its not the clearest thing ive ever read and id prefer it in straight b&w but i can read it is that closer? It'll have to do. It seems I have few compatriots for today's crusade.
arwen Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 I absolutely hate the trend most companies seem to be going on of putting grey text on white backgrounds. I hate it. Some greys are easier to read, but all give me eye strain after a while.overlay
localzuk Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 It really depends on the monitor and lighting. My old monitors display that document a lot more poorly than my shiny 6 month old one. I also have a brand new LED panel light directly above my desk so lighting is superb here. With the old strip lights, things were more difficult to deal with also.
jinnantonnixx Posted November 3, 2016 Author Posted November 3, 2016 (edited) My monitors aren't the best, and the lighting isn't great either. The grey, trendy documents probably look sublime in the designer's studio, but in the real world there are so many variables - as I can see from the replies - that the viewers experience is very inconsistent. Well, mine is at any rate. Edited November 3, 2016 by jinnantonnixx
unixman_again Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 jinnantonnixx is correct though, there is a trend for sysadmins to fiddle with perfectly good websites and make them unusable. Excessive scrolling is one usual change they make. The Birmingham Mail updated their site yesterday morning. It was never been the greatest site but as part of the upgrade, they made the images huge and now you have to scroll forever to get to what you want. They are still using very low res images which were OK when they were about 1/4 of the size they are now, but look carp in the new large economy size. I think part of the problem is they expect you to use their site on your phone, which is all well and good, but often rejigged sites don't work at all on a phone.
sted Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 jinnantonnixx is correct though, there is a trend for sysadmins to fiddle with perfectly good websites and make them unusable. Excessive scrolling is one usual change they make. The Birmingham Mail updated their site yesterday morning. It was never been the greatest site but as part of the upgrade, they made the images huge and now you have to scroll forever to get to what you want. They are still using very low res images which were OK when they were about 1/4 of the size they are now, but look carp in the new large economy size. I think part of the problem is they expect you to use their site on your phone, which is all well and good, but often rejigged sites don't work at all on a phone. just look at twitter over 1/2 the page is wasted on a 16:9 screen you could litterally have 1 tweet on the left and another on the right (maybe even a 3rd )and still have room for adverts (so it read) 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
mikeprice Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 Reads fine here - to start with when I tried to read a whole page it started to become a pain - contrast is OK for giving th eeffect but 'could do better' in terms of delivering the info
jinnantonnixx Posted November 3, 2016 Author Posted November 3, 2016 Reads fine here - to start with when I tried to read a whole page it started to become a pain - contrast is OK for giving th eeffect but 'could do better' in terms of delivering the info Yes! This is my point. At first glance, it's OK. But I had to struggle to actually read and comprehend the article. It was hard work on the eyes.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now