Cache Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 Evening Been looking at HAP+ for a bit now and it's going to fit into pluging the gap in my next project pretty nicely. The stupid question I'm going to ask is, is it better to host HAP+ on it's own server, a server doing other bits and pieces (wsus/WDS/SEC for example) or somewhere like the main file server? Cheers!
fairm010 Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 As it is a public facing service I have it installed on its own VM (4 x cores, 2GB RAM, 40gb disk) and on its own VLAN. I'd imagine that depending on the number of your remote users there may be a fair bit of traffic so its own server may be best there again. 1
3s-gtech Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 Don't dual role it onto an existing server if you can virtualise it, as is the general rule with most services now. It gives you much greater flexibility with fault tolerance, updating, upgrading etc. If your licensing allows, make a new one. 1
Cache Posted December 17, 2014 Author Posted December 17, 2014 That's what I was thinking, I'm just half aware that my VMware cluster is rapidly approaching capacity. Cheers for the replies, will do some restructuring of existing VM's to condense down before adding a new one.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now