samba_man Posted May 8, 2014 Posted May 8, 2014 I'm having a problem building computers that are on anything other than the core switch (3Com Baseline 2928-SFP Plus) on our RM CC4 network. If I try to build a machine that is on a different switch, most of the time an IP address isn't picked up and the build fails. I gather the cause is likely to be multicasting and spanning tree not getting on very well. We've got a star network with two cables going from the core switch to each of the four other switches (all are 3Com Baseline 2924-SFP Plus). I'm worried that if I turn off spanning tree to see if it's causing the problem, a loop will form. My questions are: Would the dual network cables be for redundancy or increased bandwidth? Is there a way to have the best of both worlds and have loop protection and allow multicasting to work?
kevin_lane Posted May 8, 2014 Posted May 8, 2014 You could put them on a different vlan if you use vlans
ChrisH Posted May 8, 2014 Posted May 8, 2014 If your ports are set up as a trunk or link aggregation there will not be loop. If they aren't in a trunk and spanning tree is blocking one then obviously you will get a loop.
m25man Posted May 8, 2014 Posted May 8, 2014 I take it you have set igmp snooping correctly? The switch cannot build an L2 forwarding table for multicast traffic unless you do!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now