CAM Posted August 9, 2013 Posted August 9, 2013 My rig has been suffering from stuttering and low framerate on newer games lately. Lighting is especially bad and kills FPS whilst titles like BF3 or the new Saints Row require quad-core as the industry shifts away from dual core. So how would you upgrade this PC? I am trying to work out if it is easier to upgrade or buy a new rig outright! Sadly I have no idea what motherboard I have (not that I am too confident in replacing that or the CPU!)... AMD Phenom II X2 3GHz (unlocked to 3 cores) 8GB RAM nVidia GTX275 On-board sound
HaleStorm Posted August 9, 2013 Posted August 9, 2013 (edited) upgrade Graphics to maybe a GTX650 or GTX660 that will give you the main boost of performance you need without being to expensive And if your motherboard will take AM3+ CPUs then perhaps something like this AMD Piledriver FX-6 will give you that extra oomph needed for running more multi-core stuff Edited August 9, 2013 by HaleStorm
Kitkatninja Posted August 9, 2013 Posted August 9, 2013 (edited) You haven't listed your motherboard or the type of ram that you're using, plus also the PSU is also important You may find that purchasing a AMD CPU with built in GPU, eg the AMD APU A10 6800K (that has a HD 8670D) with a compat motherboard and compat ram (if your current ram isn't), may be a cheaper option than upgrading your GC and Processor separately (but it does really depend on your upgrade choices/spec and budget). Edited August 9, 2013 by Kitkatninja
CAM Posted August 9, 2013 Author Posted August 9, 2013 I'll be honest, I have no clue what RAM and motherboard I have as I have long since thrown out the manuals etc. Oh god I'm turning into an end user. D:
Domino Posted August 9, 2013 Posted August 9, 2013 Download CPU-Z and that should tell you EVERYTHING EVAAARRRR CPUID - System & hardware benchmark, monitoring, reporting 1
CAM Posted August 9, 2013 Author Posted August 9, 2013 OK this is the stuff reported back by CPU-Z: AMD Phenom II X2 B50 3.1GHz (Bumped up to 3 core). ASUS M4A77TD Motherboard 8GB DDR3 667MHz nVidia 896MB GTX275
mrbios Posted August 9, 2013 Posted August 9, 2013 Biggest difference purely for gaming would be a new graphics card without a doubt, but that said it depends how much you're looking to spend as to what you replace and what you replace it with.
CAM Posted August 11, 2013 Author Posted August 11, 2013 I just priced up a new processor and mobo with a friend and...ouch! I will probably get a GTX660 then do the motherboard upgrade. If performance with the Phenom is acceptable then I won't bother ripping it out.
CAM Posted September 24, 2013 Author Posted September 24, 2013 Update: Almost pay day and I am shopping around! Thinking of the following: - Fan (with pre-applied paste) Arctic Cooling Freezer 13 Intel and AMD Socket.. | Ebuyer.com - FX-6350 AMD FX-6350 Socket AM3+ 3.9GHz 14MB Cache Retail Boxed.. | Ebuyer.com - Recommended AM3+ Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3 Socket AM3+ 7.1 Channel Audio ATX.. | Ebuyer.com What do you think? I was considering the A10 APU but I already have a GTX760 card since posting which proved quite awesome.
mrbios Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 Personally i reckon you'd be better off with this: Intel Core i3 4130 3.40GHz Socket 1150 3MB Cache.. | Ebuyer.com Asus B85 Plus Socket 1150 DVI D-Sub 8-Channel HD Audio.. | Ebuyer.com faster single threaded performance, much much lower energy usage, better motherboard and loads more scope for massive performance improvements should you need it. Obviously if you happened to have an extra £40 then the i5 4430 would kick the gonads off that AMD cpu.
Garacesh Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 You may find that purchasing a AMD CPU with built in GPU, eg the AMD APU A10 6800K (that has a HD 8670D) with a compat motherboard and compat ram (if your current ram isn't), may be a cheaper option than upgrading your GC and Processor separately (but it does really depend on your upgrade choices/spec and budget). Built myself an A10 rig ~6 months ago. Hasn't let me down at all. I don't particularly thrash it, most recent games I've played are DOTA 2, BF3, Saints Row 3, so hardly 'brand spanking new', but they run wonderfully at max settings. ASUS F2A55 sFM2 Motherboard, AMD A10 5800K Black Edition CPU with Corsair H60 watercooler, 8GB (2x4GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR3 RAM, 1GB MSI HD7850 Graphics Card and a 2TB Western Digital SATA3 HDD, all wired up to a SStone Strider ST60F-ES 600W PSU. Got a case and some USB speakers with it, too, but they're less important. Cost me around £650
Sunnyknight Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 (edited) Copy my rig. See and feel the difference. Only thing i might change is the HDD. Buy a Samsung, or the OCZ pci-e hdd. Also, @CAM, if you buy a AMD, you'll miss out on about 50 - 70fps on most games. Just a heads up. Edited September 24, 2013 by Sunnyknight
sonofsanta Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 (edited) Also, @CAM, if you buy a AMD, you'll miss out on about 50 - 70fps on most games. Just a heads up. [citation needed] EDIT: just to add, if you can get a Phenom II X4 it will be plenty fine. I have a Phenom II X4 965, stock-clocked at 3.4GHz, with a new Geforce 680. The CPU is what is limiting my system now - I can watch the graph in Battlefield 3 and see it happening. My FPS is still around 80-90 with never a dip below 60, with everything dialled all the way up. A quad core Phenom II is just fine. I suspect a lot of what was limiting you with the 275 was the amount of VRAM. 760 is still a good GPU, although there's been some cracking deals on 680s and 7970s recently Edited September 24, 2013 by sonofsanta
3s-gtech Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 ^^Totally disagree with you @Sunnyknight - there's so many variables there I don't know where to start. 50-70fps? More like 5-7. Your current mobo won't take an A series APU, it's on AM3. It may take an AM3+ (Bulldozer or Piledriver) CPU. A Phenom II x4 or x6 will be a decent upgrade if you stuck with your current rig, still some x4s kicking around in the channel. GPU upgrade will make the most difference, as stated. An Intel system (like for like) will give you better performance no doubt though.
Sunnyknight Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 @3s-gtech I moved from a high end AMD rig, to a high end (at the time) Intel rig. Guild wars 2:- Amd - 40fps tops Intel - 110 with ease BF3:- Amd - 50fps - 70fps Intel - 150+ constant Arma 2:- Amd - 20 - 40 fps Intel - 90+ League Of legends:- Amd - 60 - 70 Intel - 130+ This is with a straight CPU + Mobo swap. I could go on, but... i'm tired lol
3s-gtech Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 Yes, but swapping the CPU and mobo directly will mean a rebuild of Windows (unless you want the fun of clearing out the drivers and hoping you can get it to boot). Therefore, you had a different Windows install. Even my antiquated AMD setup with a GTX 680 would not be beaten by those margins versus a Haswell i7, on a like for like fresh OS install. Personal experience is valuable, but not definitive!
mrbios Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 @3s-gtech I moved from a high end AMD rig, to a high end (at the time) Intel rig. Guild wars 2:- Amd - 40fps tops Intel - 110 with ease BF3:- Amd - 50fps - 70fps Intel - 150+ constant Arma 2:- Amd - 20 - 40 fps Intel - 90+ League Of legends:- Amd - 60 - 70 Intel - 130+ This is with a straight CPU + Mobo swap. I could go on, but... i'm tired lol I'd argue that you had some sort of driver issue or messy windows install on your AMD machine. Though at the same time i completely agree with you that Intel would be better for a gaming machine than AMD would, I can't think of a single reason to build an AMD machine for a gaming PC that would be beneficial over an Intel one. Performance, energy use, drivers, even price if we talk single threaded only performance like for like (which 99% of games are) are all better on an Intel system at the moment.
CAM Posted September 24, 2013 Author Posted September 24, 2013 [citation needed] EDIT: just to add, if you can get a Phenom II X4 it will be plenty fine. I have a Phenom II X4 965, stock-clocked at 3.4GHz, with a new Geforce 680. The CPU is what is limiting my system now - I can watch the graph in Battlefield 3 and see it happening. My FPS is still around 80-90 with never a dip below 60, with everything dialled all the way up. A quad core Phenom II is just fine. I suspect a lot of what was limiting you with the 275 was the amount of VRAM. 760 is still a good GPU, although there's been some cracking deals on 680s and 7970s recently It's an AM3 board so I can just put another Phenom in? I'm technically running an X4 at the moment but it isn't a true X4 since it involved unlocking the fourth dodgy core that spams the Event log with Cache Hierarchy Error so I don't quite think it is going full pelt.
3s-gtech Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 With AM3, you can even put a Thuban core Phenom II (x4 cores with the 960T or x6 with the 1090T etc). These brought some more advances to the architecture, including Turbo-Core. They're fairly quick, and beat out Bulldozer and Piledriver in some benchmarks.
sonofsanta Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 It's an AM3 board so I can just put another Phenom in? I'm technically running an X4 at the moment but it isn't a true X4 since it involved unlocking the fourth dodgy core that spams the Event log with Cache Hierarchy Error so I don't quite think it is going full pelt. Anything Phenom II will slot in. Replacing a CPU isn't difficult, just a case of taking off the cooler, undoing the lever and lifting the old CPU out. If you're going to re-use your existing cooler you'll want some new thermal paste (clean all the old gunk off first), but it's not much more involved than any other component swap. See what eBay may bring, there doesn't seem to be any stock left at the usual suspects. See how you run with your existing CPU first though, it may not bring you many gains now you've upped your GPU.
HaleStorm Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 (edited) Id say your AMD install was messed up with those kind of framerates....see my sig for my AMD spec, I get aroun 80fps in BF3 and in 1080p you wont notice a massive difference in any framerate over 60 because your eyes just dont detect the difference Its a shame its not an AM3+ slot because the FX range are pretty good especially for the price...perhaps the highest phenom you can get your hands on is the best bet, even the highest end x4s are reasonably priced now Edited September 25, 2013 by HaleStorm
X-13 Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 you wont notice a massive difference in any framerate over 60 because your eyes just dont detect the difference I don't think I can tell the difference if it's above 30FPS... But that may be because I've never really managed to get anything higher than 40FPS. [One time, I got 120FPS on WoW. Then they did an update... Bye, awesome FPS.]
Garacesh Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 I'm commonly clocking at least 60fps as a minimum on my rig (spec on previous page) and that's an AMD
HaleStorm Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 Having Windows 8 Installed helps your Framerate too...i saw a boost of 10-15fps on W8 over W7
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now