FN-GM Posted June 23, 2013 Author Posted June 23, 2013 @FN-GM - don't suppose you know what ver of esx 5 that was? Looking at doing the same with ESX 5.1 this summer. Version 5.1 update 1. 1
synaesthesia Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 Hohum. Time to do some real thorough testing with it first then! Cheers for the heads up.
FN-GM Posted June 23, 2013 Author Posted June 23, 2013 Hohum. Time to do some real thorough testing with it first then! Cheers for the heads up. Thats the only thing that has been trouble
Arthur Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 The solution was to change the network card on the distribution point virtual machine from E1000E to VMXNET 3. Is there any reason you weren't already using VMXNET3 for 2008 R2 given its many advantages over E1000E? Performance Best Practices for vSphere 5.1 « VMware VMware also offers the VMXNET family of paravirtualized network adapters, however, that provide better performance than these default adapters and should be used for optimal performance within any guest operating system for which they are available. The paravirtualized network adapters in the VMXNET family implement an idealized network interface that passes network traffic between the virtual machine and the physical network interface cards with minimal overhead. The VMXNET virtual network adapters (particularly VMXNET3) also offer performance features not found in the other virtual network adapters. Drivers for VMXNET-family adapters are available for most guest operating systems supported by ESXi. The VMXNET family contains VMXNET, Enhanced VMXNET (available since ESX/ESXi 3.5), and VMXNET Generation 3 (VMXNET3; available since ESX/ESXi 4.0). The VMXNET3 adapter is the next generation of Para virtualized NIC designed for performance. The VMXNET3 network adapter is a 10Gb virtual NIC. Drivers are shipped with the VMware tools and most OSs are supported. VMXNET3 is much faster than e1000 or e1000e. VMXNET3 has less CPU overhead compared to e1000 or e1000e. VMXNET3 is more stable than e1000 or e1000e. (Source)
FN-GM Posted June 23, 2013 Author Posted June 23, 2013 Is there any reason you weren't already using VMXNET3 for 2008 R2 given its many advantages over E1000E? Performance Best Practices for vSphere 5.1 « VMware It was what is used as default.
Arthur Posted June 23, 2013 Posted June 23, 2013 It was what is used as default. Ah! An easy mistake to make.
ozmusafir Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 Hey, I am new to this forum and decided to join after years of luring. As Microsoft suggested in there documentation it is not a good idea to upgrade. A migration is better suited since it limits the errors associated with upgrading.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now