round2it Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 (edited) on the microsoft licencing website i have found my server 2008r2 enterprise licence key but it says i have 3/50 activation /seats I got the enterprise version so i could use hyper v and use the 4 licences that come with it for my vms is this correct? can i use this licence on another server or does it have to be on my host for the vms im a little confused by the 3/50 bit can anyone shed any light on this for me please possibly @Millgate might be able to help Edited May 16, 2013 by round2it
zag Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 I think its per server so a virtual machine would use another license. 1
plexer Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 In the volume licence centre no matter how many licences you have physically bought there will be x amount of activations for that mak key available. It doesn't mean you can legally install it 50 times. Ben 1
round2it Posted May 16, 2013 Author Posted May 16, 2013 (edited) ah im good for another 47 complete system crashes and reinstalls before MS get on my back. is it right that enterprise server 2008r2 lets me use upto 3 vms without purchasing a new license i need to dig out the paper work Edited May 16, 2013 by round2it
Netman Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 They give you lots of slack - under EES you can add server (and other products) during the year but only have to declare how many you are actually using at renewal. It's good for testing new systems... 1
Millgate Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 You must use the licensed server to host the VMs The activations displayed are for the remaining MAK or KMS activations … 47 activations left after which you'll will be required to contact Microsoft for more 1
CAWJames Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 The way it works on the enterprise license(which doesn't exist anymore, as you have to get 2012 Standards or DataCentre now on EES), is that you are allowed 3 VM's on the host if the host does other work other than just being a hyper-v host, if the host is only doing hyper-v hosting, nothing else, then you can install 4 VM's. And here's the other kicker, its not just Windows VM's for the limit, ie the 3/4 limit is for any operating system, so you can't install 3/4 Windows server VM's and loads of little linux ones. The limit is for any OS. James 1
SYNACK Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 The way it works on the enterprise license(which doesn't exist anymore, as you have to get 2012 Standards or DataCentre now on EES), is that you are allowed 3 VM's on the host if the host does other work other than just being a hyper-v host, if the host is only doing hyper-v hosting, nothing else, then you can install 4 VM's. And here's the other kicker, its not just Windows VM's for the limit, ie the 3/4 limit is for any operating system, so you can't install 3/4 Windows server VM's and loads of little linux ones. The limit is for any OS. James I don't think that is correct, besides linux is unstable as anything under hyper-v so why would you want to.
plexer Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 The way it works on the enterprise license(which doesn't exist anymore, as you have to get 2012 Standards or DataCentre now on EES), is that you are allowed 3 VM's on the host if the host does other work other than just being a hyper-v host, if the host is only doing hyper-v hosting, nothing else, then you can install 4 VM's. And here's the other kicker, its not just Windows VM's for the limit, ie the 3/4 limit is for any operating system, so you can't install 3/4 Windows server VM's and loads of little linux ones. The limit is for any OS. James How can MS licences restrict the number of Linux guest vm's you can install that's daft? Link to some documentation please. Ben
ConradJones Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 And here's the other kicker, its not just Windows VM's for the limit, ie the 3/4 limit is for any operating system, so you can't install 3/4 Windows server VM's and loads of little linux ones. The limit is for any OS. Sources please????
CAWJames Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 I am looking for the sources we got the info from, when we came across this. I was adamant that MS couldn't stop us installing linux, but their definition of a VOS in 2008R2 includes any operating system. Let me search my email for the proof our development manager found to shoot me down and then I will post it. James
CAWJames Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 http://www.edugeek.net/forums/licensing-questions/92756-windows-server-2008r2-enterprise-vm-rights.html in the meantime James
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now