Jump to content
  • entry
    1
  • comments
    9
  • views
    227

Head Demanded Independent ICT Consultants View!


Hello Everyone

 

Just wondering if anyone else has been on the recieving end of a HT bringing in independent ICT Consultants to conduct an ICT Audit?

 

The story is this. A new SLT was formed approx 3 years ago. I notified the new SLT, (including Business Manager) then that we would need an investment in our back end in 2016. This was communicated to them at an ICT Strategy meeting and via an annual ICT Audit report that I send to all SLT members.

 

I carried out numerous hours worth of research and costing exercises, that I am sure you are all familiar with, until I arrived at my decision for the proposed change. In February 2016 I submitted my proposal and it was then added to the agenda for next ICT Strategy meeting. I packaged the proposal as normal with initial proposal, business case, research notes, details of the recommendation including company details, costs etc. The HT agreed that the work needed carried out, but she requested an Independent Consultation and Second Opinion on the proposal.

 

This was the first time in my 25 year career in the IT Industry that my judgement has been called into question. I have looked after several budgets and invested wisely and productively for establishments over the years and I pride myself on my business decisions.

 

Today, the ICT Consultant attended school and was impressed that I had all business cases, project plans and costings available. He agreed with my proposal for the backend system renewal stating that it was an excellent decision. He was also asked by th HT to check on internet connectivity and server side issues. Before he took a look at these I informed him that during that past two years we have been unable to carry out any essential maintenance during school holidays due to the amount of revision classes that have taken place. For example, I have scheduled the upgrade of a Server 2003 Fileserver on two occasions even though I informed the SLT that 2003 was no longer supported and that we could run into trouble because of that. The consultant could not believe this and marked it down to add to his final report that will be presented to the HT. All server and switch event logs were checked and, as I already expected, these checks were greeted with good comments with no technical problems to report.

 

I possibly looked at this the wrong way and took it that the SLT had lost confidence in me, or that the new SLT are just being thorough. It would be good hear some views on this especially if someone has been in the same position.

 

Cheers

 

Ed :p

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

mukz

Posted

Hi Ed,

 

We have just had a case of that here. I ended up taking a month off for personal reasons and all the problems i had brought to light over a year long period actually occured over the month i was away not looking after anything.

The Network Manager doesn't like to get involved - keeps to himself and would rather let someone else deal with the problems. Has become manager due to members of the team leaving.

 

Needless to say i was getting calls whilst i was away asking to get things sorted out. As i wasn't the Manager, they felt i was not in a position to be making decisions or telling the school on what needed to be done.

We hired a new Director of Operations who quickly saw that i was right and did the same thing. Called in an external Consultant who echoed my views + many more management and strategic failures.

edsa131

Posted

Hi - thanks for contributing. It is strange that you say "The Network Manager doesn't like to get involved". The manager should be out front explaining decisions and defending staff. Have you been rewarded or recognised for your views and advice?
cmpwat

Posted

Hi Ed

 

Sorry to hear yo have been through this!

 

I to have been though this at a school i used to work at, to the point that I had a mental breakdown due to the stress that SLT were causing me. Whilst off sick, the school got a consultant company in that ripped the IT systems apart, which was ironic as it was that company that had helped me to install them.

 

On the back of the report that they produced, the HT suspended me and asked me to a meeting to discuss the findings, which I had produced a 30odd page response to. At that meeting he brought up things like salary and budget, both of which were out of my control!

 

At the end of the process they had no grounds to get rid of me but offered me a compromise agreement to resign, which due to the breakdown in trust, I accepted.

 

I then discovered that the company that produced the report took over as the managed IT Services and since then they have messed the systems up completely! oh how I laugh!!!!

 

So no, you not the only one to have gone through it, but stick to your guns, be strong and don't let the barstools beat you down!

 

And if you are looking for a company to use to help you, DO NOT USE Commercial IT Services in Cheltenham.....

jimmy_2k

Posted

I have been here, in the end the HT realized that Managed Services wasn't worth it :-)
ITBloke

Posted

Hi Guys

 

Don't get stressed over consultants being brought in by SLT, it's common practice. Use them to your advantage, just be prepared with all the evidence you need to get them on your side then use them to put your ideas across. They can be a big crowbar to getting extra funding for upgrades and new kit for your network, don't fear them, use them.

 

I've had three of these experiences in the 13 years I've been at our school, every time ended in vast improvements to network infrastructure, be wary of the big sell though, a lot of these "consultants" are just salesmen with technical knowledge, make sure what they're suggesting is what your school needs.

cmpwat

Posted

Don't get stressed......as the one never to have lost his job to a bunch of backstabbing consultants.

 

The consultants that audited my network were the ones that I worked with, took their advice, installed their recommendations and then they slated it in order to sell managed services. I lost the job I loved because of them, so excuse me if I sound bitter and sceptical about your experience.

 

It has taken me 18months to pick myself up and get back to the level that I was at; to rebuild my confidence, and to be honest it is still work in progress. I am managing an IT department again, but I didn't know I was ready when offered the job, but I knew I was ready to try.

 

I'm not saying this will happen to everyone, but I do have to tell my story as a warning that this does happen.

ITBloke

Posted

I'm sorry you had a bad time of it cmpwat... my comment wasn't a pop at you.
limawhiskey

Posted

It must have been frustrating but it sounds like the consultant was reasonable and backed up your view. I think it's good to have the odd sanity check now and again. Did you get to see a copy of the report?

 

I've been asked to do something similar but I'm relatively inexperienced yet the most technical here, so I'll be glad to have someone to work on our strategy with. If you get chance, could you PM me the consultant's details?

GrumbleDook

Posted

I've been on both sides of this, having had consultants brought in and also having been the external person.

 

There is nothing wrong with a critical friend, it is when the consultant has their own agenda that you need to be careful.

 

Whenever I've gone in I generally give the following rules to people. Ensure everything said is factual, backed it up with evidence, there is no such thing as the perfect solution and we are all only human (or mainly human in some cases).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...