geeegs
Members-
Posts
8 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
0 NeutralAbout geeegs

-
I've been tasked with investigating if there are any alternatives to the ActivAll Program, so that we can compare/contrast before we go ahead and invest in this. Has anyone had any prior experience with ActivAll?
-
At one of my schools, we're in the process of transitioning away from Schools Broadband, to another provider. As it turns out, there's a 90 day termination "you must give us not less than ninety (90) days' notice in writing to be given before the end of the Minimum Term or any and each Renewal Term" which was on 01/01/23 and it's now the 10/01 After speaking with them today, we have now "auto enrolled until 31/03/24" which I haven't come across before with any other suppliers. Has anyone else come across a similar situation as this?
-
I've already got DKIM set up for our domain as so v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:***@***.net Are you saying that if we have that DMARC policy, then I don't need to worry about editing the SPF records? I can just revert to include:_spf.google.com
-
After getting to grips with this site, it appears that my original v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:arbor-education.com ~all Included these values verbatim v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:8475353.spf02.hubspotemail.net include:email.chargebee.com ~all So, I'm going to change my SPF values to v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:8475353.spf02.hubspotemail.net include:email.chargebee.com ~all without the include:arbor-education.com value Although, curiously chargebee's domains/IPs seem to be failing, Info: The domain [email.chargebee.com] configured primary nameservers [208.94.148.4, 2600:1800:10:0:0:0:0:1, 208.80.124.4, 2600:1801:11:0:0:0:0:1, 208.80.126.4, 2600:1802:12:0:0:0:0:1, 208.80.125.4, 2600:1801:13:0:0:0:0:1, 208.80.127.4, 2600:1802:14:0:0:0:0:1, 208.94.149.4, 2600:1800:15:0:0:0:0:1] did not produce a result, we've used a fallback server
-
Thanks for your replies. That DMARC Analyzer website is handy. It gives the error message " Warning : The maximum amount of 10 lookups exceeded. ISPs could ignore your SPF record Info : The domain [email.chargebee.com] configured primary nameservers [208.80.125.4, 2600:1801:13:0:0:0:0:1, 208.94.149.4, 2600:1800:15:0:0:0:0:1, 208.80.124.4, 2600:1801:11:0:0:0:0:1, 208.94.148.4, 2600:1800:10:0:0:0:0:1, 208.80.126.4, 2600:1802:12:0:0:0:0:1, 208.80.127.4, 2600:1802:14:0:0:0:0:1] did not produce a result, we've used a fallback server" As for the Arbor support article, that's where I got all those IP addresses I've mentioned in the original post, the ones whereby the enom address field can't contain all the characters. Appreciate you raising it with them to see if there are any they can drop.
-
For the past month, we've had emails that have been sent to parents' emails, either going into their junk, or worse still, not being received by them at all. I've tried speaking with Arbor directly, but as we buy our Arbor support through our Local Authority, they advise that I use them as a conduit. The problem there is, that our LA are very slow at replying to helpdesk messages. To make our position clear, I'll explain what I've implemented on our end. It may be that I've not done something correctly, I don't think I have but I'm open to the possibility. We purchase our domain through Google via enom. The values I added from Arbor are so: [TABLE=width: 500] [TR] [TD]out._domainkey[/TD] [TD]out.domainkey.u189***.wl225.sendgrid.net. [/TD] [TD]CNAME[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]out2._domainkey[/TD] [TD]out2.domainkey.u189***.wl225.sendgrid.net.[/TD] [TD]CNAME[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]em5225[/TD] [TD]u189***.wl225.sendgrid.net.[/TD] [TD]CNAME[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] the dots at the end of the addresses (net.) were not in the documentation, nor were entered by me, but were appended after hitting the save button. I amended our SPF record from [TABLE=width: 500] [TR] [TD]v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] to [TABLE=width: 500] [TR] [TD]v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:arbor-education.com ~all[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] Now, I tried following the instructions at this link but the address field within enom has a character limit. The idea being to edit the SPF record so that it would look like this [TABLE=width: 500] [TR] [TD]v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:167.89.0.0/17 ip4:208.117.48.0/20 ip4:50.31.32.0/19 ip4:198.37.144.0/20 ip4:198.21.0.0/21 ip4:192.254.112.0/20 ip4:168.245.0.0/17 ip4:149.72.0.0/16 ip4:223.165.113.0/24 ip4:223.165.115.0/24 ip4:223.165.118.0/23 ip4:223.165.120.0/23 ~all[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] However, when attempting to include all this information, the count is hit at [TABLE=width: 500] [TR] [TD]v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:167.89.0.0/17 ip4:208.117.48.0/20 ip4:50.31.32.0/19 ip4:198.37.144.0/20 ip4:198.21.0.0/21 ip4:192.254.112.0/20 ip4:168.245.0.0/17 ip4:149.72.0.0/16 ip4:223.165.113.0/24 ip4:223.165.115.0/24 ip4:223.165.118.0/23 ip4:223.16[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] So I'm a little stuck on how to proceed. With the SPF record [TABLE=width: 500] [TR] [TD]v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:arbor-education.com ~all[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] and checking using Google's MX Toolbox, the verification that used to have no errors, now contains these: The domain's SPF record could not be resolved within 10 DNS queries. and The SPF string can not be parsed, do you have any typos in it? Decision permanent error in processing Explanation SPF Permanent Error: Too many DNS lookups Record v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:arbor-education.com ~all Any help would be appreciated.
-
Just over two years ago, we bought fourteen Genee Classic 50" interactive screens. The supplied pens that they came with weren't great (a bit like their interactivity) and now most of the nibs have snapped off the end, thus making them useless as a touching device. However, trying to find replacement pens is turning out to be a real nightmare! With regards to purchasing, we're allowed to buy from Amazon, but only Amazon themselves, not a reseller selling their wares on the site. Has anyone else come across a similar problem? And did you manage to get replacement pens from somewhere that didn't cost the earth. Thanks
