Skoggmeiger

Ah, but how much of that is definitively the WiFi and not other ambient radiation levels from your laptop or any other electrical devices in the room, or indeed other factors such as eye-strain from staring at the screen, poor lighting in your room, incorrect seating position, the mobile on the desk next to you, etc etc etc. Try turning off the WiFi (access point and laptop) and see if you feel any different. Then and only then would you have anything to go on, and even that would just be one person's opinion and not any quality research. I wrongly presumed you would have fathomed that I didn't feel like sh*t, when Wi-Fi was turned off. One again, I'm not asking for Wi-Fi to be banned, I merely believe further testing needs to be done, but some of you on here, especially yourself, ignorantly disregard an opposing opinion on the debate. A small mole may only be a small mole, but leave it too long and it might become a melanoma.

Why ? Because she deserved it. How did she get to Sweden ? In a plane I would like to guess. How did she cope with the cosmic radiation ? So thats ONE person in the UK which has a population of around 70 million. If she is THAT concerned then she should move. Now you are suggesting that cosmic radiation and Wi-Fi have the same effects. She is one person that we know about. It's not as if thousands of people can suddenly go to their Doctor and say "I'm suffering from Wi-Fi signals" Why? Because they might not know what it is that is affecting them.

I could also ask why so many people have a vendetta against wifi? You should never answer a question with a question. Don't get me wrong, I use Wi-Fi at home, but I'll be bluntly honest and tell you that after a few hours infront of my laptop, I feel like sh*t!

Again, people are now mocking this women. People never used to believe in M.E, until that was proven. Do any of you have vested interests in Wi-Fi? Why so resolute in your defence of it?

Let me put it this way. I spent 13 years in the army, many of them heavily involved with radio comms as an NCO. Now, the army comms gear is many, many more times powerful than any wi-fi gear that gets used, and so far thousands od servicemen have totally failed to keel over with exploding skulls and eye sockets on fire. Personally I really disliked the way that the signal was referred to as 'radiation', and almost all of the laguage used was ambiguous and scare mongering. Lots of 'possibly', 'maybe', 'perhaps' were used. I did not hear one 'definitely'. A scare story, nothing more, however I think that a proper investigation would not go amiss though. This is the problem with most people's argument on here. You presume that because nobody has yet grown a second head that there can't be any dangers with Wi-Fi. Yes, the show was one-sided, but did you expect anything else? It was a show to alert us to the fact that this "amazing" technology that we have all taken to our hearts, and installed in our homes and buildings, might actually need further testing to make sure it isn't a danger to us. Don't forget, children have far thinner skulls than adults, so the effects, if there are any will be greater on them. If nothing else, the show probably did us all a favour. Those that don't currently have Wi-Fi networks might not be asked to install them now. Your job has possibly just been made easier.

Have to agree about the PCL5e. By far the most stable. PCL6 seems to be causing lots of issues in FMS at the moment too for some reason.