enjay Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Something went pop at BT last week, meaning we were without our Internet connection from Thursday evening until Monday lunchtime - this got me thinking about the merits of having a second line in place to use in such circumstances. Should we get something totally non-BT related, e.g. Virgin cable, or would a different ADSL provider be sufficient?
FN-GM Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 I would go down the cable route for another line. Something happens to say the post outside that feeds your school it will take down both connections.
Geoff Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Whatever you get you must make sure that it takes a totally different route to your site. More than once I've been on a site that's had it's main net connection taken out by some building work and everyone wonder why the backup didn't kick. Until I point out it runs down the same ducting that got run over by the JCB as the main fibre.
Michael Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 I agree - a totally different provider and connection. Otherwise as FN-GM mentioned above, you could have two BT lines down as they'd be fed from the same local exchange most likely.
Michael Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 The problem with other providers is that they're still using BT phone lines. Cable is your only option realistically.
AngryTechnician Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 (edited) The ideal solution is to get something complete separate. Our backup line is in a different building, but does feed back to the same street cabinet. That said, one is FTCC, the other is ADSL, and on different ISPs. As of yet, we've not lost both at the same time even when there was a problem at the exchange. Having it in a separate building also means that if the worst happens and the server room burns down, we can have something up and running very quickly. I suspect we've all experienced the agonising wait of how long a brand new DSL line can take to be provisioned. Edited December 4, 2012 by AngryTechnician
zag Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 We have a 100mbit fiber line + 80mbit Infinity line as a backup. We keep both routers online all the time and its easy to switch over the IP addresses at any time. Recently we also got a talk talk adsl line that is used for our guest wireless system which could be used in an emergency.
enjay Posted December 4, 2012 Author Posted December 4, 2012 That said, one is FTCC, the other is ADSL, and on different ISPs. As of yet, we've not lost both at the same time even when there was a problem at the exchange. That was my thinking too. A cable line following a completely different route would be preferable for all the reasons above, but as you say, short of a digger going through our cable the chances of an FTTC connection and an ADSL connection both being affected are quite small. The upheaval would be less too, as we could use our existing phone lines rather than have to dig anything up to lay new cables.
enjay Posted December 4, 2012 Author Posted December 4, 2012 (edited) We keep both routers online all the time and its easy to switch over the IP addresses at any time. Why keep them both powered up and swap IPs? Would it not be easier to have both of them using the same internal IP address and then just connect the LAN to whichever you wanted to use, that way the clients would connect immediately? Edited December 4, 2012 by enjay
laserblazer Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 To be honest, I think it does staff and pupils good to realise that the technology is fallible and to get them to resort to Plan B. If the internet goes down here I'll tether a laptop to a phone for the Office Manager to access emails.
enjay Posted December 4, 2012 Author Posted December 4, 2012 To be honest, I think it does staff and pupils good to realise that the technology is fallible and to get them to resort to Plan B. If the internet goes down here I'll tether a laptop to a phone for the Office Manager to access emails. I disagree. I don't think teachers should be required to plan a backup lesson/activity every time they include a web resource in their lesson. Also, there are some things for which an Internet connection is essential and the lack of it could have a significant impact - paid-for online training, times where pupils have been removed from class in a pre-agreed lesson to complete online assessments, visiting speakers in assemblies, etc. Plus, our email, calendars and home-school communication are all web-based, so we have a greater reliance on Internet connectivity than some schools might.
zag Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Why keep them both powered up and swap IPs? Would it not be easier to have both of them using the same internal IP address and then just connect the LAN to whichever you wanted to use, that way the clients would connect immediately? Never thought of it like that, but yeh that sounds sensible too. I've only needed it once and by the time I'd walked up to the server room and plugged it in the Fiber line was back up
laserblazer Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 I disagree. I don't think teachers should be required to plan a backup lesson/activity every time they include a web resource in their lesson. Also, there are some things for which an Internet connection is essential and the lack of it could have a significant impact - paid-for online training, times where pupils have been removed from class in a pre-agreed lesson to complete online assessments, visiting speakers in assemblies, etc. Plus, our email, calendars and home-school communication are all web-based, so we have a greater reliance on Internet connectivity than some schools might. And where's this reliance going to lead us? We are already at a stage where transport and commerce collapses when the computer system goes down. It's all going to go pear-shaped one day and it's the people living in mud huts who will survive.
Geoff Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Yes, you have to look at the system as a whole. Not just one bit. What's the point of have fail over on your Internet connectivity if you don't have redundancy in your core network or server infrastructure? What about underlying supporting systems like power and air con for example? If you take this to the Nth degree you end up with a very large price tag attached to it and you need to ask yourself if it's really worth the time, effort and expense? Granted if your running a hospital or a stock exchange then yes it probably is. In your average school? No I think your standard disaster recovery is sufficient.
enjay Posted December 4, 2012 Author Posted December 4, 2012 And where's this reliance going to lead us? We are already at a stage where transport and commerce collapses when the computer system goes down. It's all going to go pear-shaped one day and it's the people living in mud huts who will survive. I think that IT systems are like lights and heating - things which staff should be able to rely on being present. You don't expect teachers to prepare lessons which can be taught in the dark just in case the lights go out, nor do you expect them to prepare lessons which children can do despite wearing gloves because the boiler is off. By the same measure, in today's world, they should be able to plan a lesson expecting that they will have the Internet.
laserblazer Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 But that's the point. We do get powercuts or a breaker trips and the lights go out. It tends to be daylight, so they can continue to teach for a while, same with the heating. If it becomes a problem, then we close the school. That's where the tethered laptop comes in. The Office Manager can access parentmail even though the phones and internet are down. I'm not saying teachers should have a physical Plan B for every lesson. In the very rare event that they lose the internet they should be able to improvise if they know their subject.
enjay Posted December 4, 2012 Author Posted December 4, 2012 I'm not saying teachers should have a physical Plan B for every lesson. In the very rare event that they lose the internet they should be able to improvise if they know their subject. Assuming that is possible. What if the lesson was to be an online assessment (e.g. Midyis) or a webinar? Also, what about all the things which staff do other than front-of-class teaching? Things like teachers preparing lessons, all staff sending emails (internally and externally), finance dept accessing online banking or transferring payroll data, business manager doing CRB checks, librarian using hosted library catalogue, marketing updating website, etc. There is no Plan B for those nor is there room to improvise, and some are time-critical.
enjay Posted December 4, 2012 Author Posted December 4, 2012 (edited) But that's the point. We do get powercuts or a breaker trips and the lights go out. And that is why the site team have spare light bulbs, ready for that to happen. I am suggesting similar, a spare Internet connection. This wouldn't protect us against power cuts, of course, but it is one less thing to go wrong. We can't prepare contingency for all eventualities, but there are some for which we can prepare. Edited December 4, 2012 by enjay
elsiegee40 Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Where I see that spare line becoming critical will be exams. We are rapidly approaching the situation where public exams will have components taken online... Having a line available on a specific day at a specific time will be essential.
laserblazer Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Where I see that spare line becoming critical will be exams. We are rapidly approaching the situation where public exams will have components taken online... Having a line available on a specific day at a specific time will be essential. Sorry, but someone has to provide for a scenario where it simply isn't available. Believe me, this will happen at some time. A big slice of the population will be without any internet access at all. A similar situation was the King's Cross bombings, when the mobile phone networks got so overloaded they fell over and the emergency services suffered as a result. They have subsequently come up with a Plan B.
CyberNerd Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Sorry, but someone has to provide for a scenario where it simply isn't available. Believe me, this will happen at some time. A big slice of the population will be without any internet access at all. A similar situation was the King's Cross bombings, when the mobile phone networks got so overloaded they fell over and the emergency services suffered as a result. They have subsequently come up with a Plan B. I think the exam boards will be sympathetic if there are multiple dead following a terrorist attack. We have an automatic ADSL failover line which kicks in if our leased line fails. Its happened once and worked like a charm.
enjay Posted December 4, 2012 Author Posted December 4, 2012 They have subsequently come up with a Plan B. Which is exactly what I'm doing - asking for advice about a Plan B.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now