Jollity Posted June 26, 2012 Author Posted June 26, 2012 Mrs Enjay has just bought an 11" Samsung, very nice piece of kit - £330 and weighing in at just 1.6KG. Something like the 305U? They seem to have a range of them actually. Actually, might be worth me giving PC world a visit, to do some window shopping.
enjay Posted June 26, 2012 Posted June 26, 2012 Something like the 305U? They seem to have a range of them actually. Yes, that's the one.
enjay Posted June 27, 2012 Posted June 27, 2012 Okay - full disclosure time. Mrs Enjay has just returned her 11" Samsung, and we've bought a 13" instead. She found the screen was too small, especially since the only resolution it could (sensibly) render is 1368x768 which is just a bit teeny on an 11" screen. She also found that the processor (AMD E450 1.65Ghz) couldn't handle Bejeweled Blitz, which is a total show-stopper :-) 1
Jollity Posted June 28, 2012 Author Posted June 28, 2012 Thank you very much for coming back to update, Enjay. I'm sorry your wife had her shape matching interrupted. I am a little concerned that the E-450 could not handle a Flash web game. However when I had a look at Bejeweled Blitz it does seem to use a remarkable amount of processing for what it is apparently doing. In what way did it not cope? Stuttering animation?
enjay Posted June 29, 2012 Posted June 29, 2012 Bejeweled Blitz is oddly resource-intensive - I notice performance differences between my home computer and some of our older-but-still-well-specced PCs in school. On the school PCs, it just runs a little slower, taking a bit longer to drop the next pieces into place, but the on E-450 it was unplayable as it would take sometimes as much as a few seconds to move the pieces after clicking on them. So, I think that might be as much about the game as it is about the laptop; the screen size issue remains regardless though - 11.6" is small, and 1360x768 is a small resolution for a screen that size (I tried changing it, but the driver doesn't have any other widescreen options on it). I think 11.6" is fine in some contexts, and have no problems using my 10" tablet, but I am conscious that when I use that, I am holding it much closer than I do with a laptop screen. The 13" she's replaced it with is much nicer (for other reasons, she got an Ultrabook rather than a "normal" laptop, and that is really nice too!). 1
enjay Posted June 29, 2012 Posted June 29, 2012 Another point to note about these models (both the 11.6" 305U and the 13" 530U3B which we've replaced it with) is that the LAN port isn't full-size as standard, but includes a little flap which you need to pull down in order to make the cable fit (I'm not explaining that very well, I can take photos if you want!). I don't think that would survive very long in a classroom context before someone snaps it off, at which point I don't think the LAN cable would "click" into place any more. 1
SimpleSi Posted June 29, 2012 Posted June 29, 2012 is that the LAN port isn't full-size as standard, But generally the users don't use the lan port on a laptop so prob going to be OK Si 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now