Irazmus Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 I have recently been told by a supplier that stacking switches using a backplane is old-hat and that the current practice is to stack using the Gig uplinks. Is this true, and if you were installing a new network which would you choose?
plexer Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 I know that the HP 2650's only have gig and mini gbic ports for this. Ben
Geoff Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 Here's a whitepaper on how HP Procurves do it: http://www.hp.com/rnd/pdfs/Stacking_White_Paper.pdf Pratically though, what I have here is a mix. Some switches are stacked using GigE or fibre. However, several of the 3com units are stacked using 3coms proprietary backplane system.
localzuk Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 It depends on the switches you have really. For example D-Link are moving away from the old 'chasis' type switch and favouring their Xstack style of product - these use a proprietory backplane. Personally, I use HP 2650's with fibre uplinks to the core switch and the switches are stacked for easy management. The question that is important is 'do I need super speedy backplane speeds or will standard uplinks to a core be suitable'. Everyone has different requirements.
bishopsgarthstockton Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 all my 3com switches are stacked, can some one explain to me what the term 'backplane' means?
localzuk Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backplane, it doesn't specifically mention networking but it covers it in general.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now