Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
In other words, the Microsoft Hyper-V is still not up to scratch when compared with Xen and VMWare, so they are washing their hands of it.

 

Besides real live migration I don't see what Hyper-V is missing - also if you take a look System Centre VMM already supports both Hyper-V and VMWare and the BETA includes XenServer support as well.

Posted
I didn't say it was missing anything. I said it wasn't up to scratch. It might have all the features and more of Xen, but it was a complete pain to get working when I tried it around 4 months ago. In fact, I spent 2 weeks jumping through hoops to try and get it going on our brand new hardware, and in the end opted for Xen which I got going in about 10 minutes - in that manner, it isn't up to scratch.
Posted

Odd one there - I found it as easy to setup as installing a copy of Server 2008 R2 on any normal bit of server kit.

Setting things up for HA was again very easy with System Centre doing all the leg work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...