Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It wont need allot really.

 

Seeing as you will be running Server 2008 R2 i would run a minimum of 2GB for the OS. I shouldn't think you need anymore for the printers.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
If you have print management software on i would stick another 1 GB in.

 

Just put 4gb in it , 2 for the OS and 2 spare which can either be used by OS or printers or whatever.

Posted

is it physical or virtual? and how many processors are you giving it? in my expericence the spooler service uses more cpu then ram especially when printing long runs of sims reports

 

although not great amount if virtual give a minimum of 2 processors

Posted
If you have print management software on i would stick another 1 GB in.

 

future proofing and who knows, they might want to use the server later on for an extra role or two, better to have it and not need it, then need it and not have it. would be interested to know how many cpu's this server has.

 

I thought more network admins were using more then one print server and load balancing them ( clustering them - whatever the correct term is ) so if one falls over it auto magically re directs to the backup print server without any tweaking or changes.

 

Is there a suggested amount of printers you are meant to have on one print server ie

 

60 per print server - or is this purely down to the specs of the server and also how much pressure it will put on the print spooler service ?

Posted
future proofing and who knows, they might want to use the server later on for an extra role or two, better to have it and not need it, then need it and not have it. would be interested to know how many cpu's this server has.

 

I disagree memory is an easy upgrade and can be sorted later down the line

Posted
Yeah would agree with MJS_MJS on that. Start off with the basics and you can add more if needs be.

 

Especially as in 2008 you can see what the print spooler or any app is using resource wise. Task manager > Resource monitor (i think) and you can see the RAM CPU and NETWORK usage of the application. So it's easy to find out how much the app is using and increase if necessary.

Posted
Although 2008 R2 doesn't have SuperFetch like Windows 7 has, won't more RAM be useful for caching stuff in memory? 2GB does seem a bit low.
Posted
Depends on it's use - our print server is 2* dual core xeon 2.8GHz, with 2GB of RAM. We have about 50 printers on it and pcounter. Spool folder sits on a 20GB partition and yes it has filled that previously. We are running win server 2003 sp2 tho, so it's a little less memory intensive than 2008R2.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...