Quackers Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 If i have a 2008 Server R2 running MS Virtual Server, do i need an OS licence for each Virtual Server? or is it covered because there is already a Windows Server licence for the hardware its running on? I have had a look at the Licensing Wiki but it has no real information yet.
dhicks Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 If i have a 2008 Server R2 running MS Virtual Server, do i need an OS licence for each Virtual Server? Yes, but you can also get Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, which gives you four VM licenses, or Datacentre, which lets you run unlimited VMs per server. -- David Hicks 1
dyoung5 Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Windows server 2003 and upwards have specific licensing considerations for virtualization depending on which edition: Standard edition: you need one license for each instance, virtual or physical Enterprise edition: you get one license for a physical instance, and 4 licenses for virtual instances running on the same hardware Datacenter edition: licensed per processor, you get one license for a physical instance and unlimited licenses for virtual instances running on the same hardware. Hope this info is useful. David 1
Quackers Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 I hate Microsoft some times Nothing is simple.
DMcCoy Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Also if you migrate a VM to another host within 180 days (iirc) you need an additional license for it on the host it was migrated to. Windows server licenses are allocated to the physical host, even when they are VMs. The only way to avoid this restriction is not to migrate hosts within the time limit or buy datacenter for the hosts.
KeithMPhoenix Posted February 2, 2010 Posted February 2, 2010 Just to add to the earlier comments re 2008r2 - its worth noting that Datacenter can only be run on a server with a minimum of 2 Processors. 2
dhicks Posted February 2, 2010 Posted February 2, 2010 its worth noting that Datacenter can only be run on a server with a minimum of 2 Processors. Minimum? Why? Is this due to some performance issue (more than 4 Windows VMs running on a single processor might be a bit of a strain)? -- David Hicks
KeithMPhoenix Posted February 2, 2010 Posted February 2, 2010 Hi David - apologies, I should have clarified, this is from a licensing perspective.
dhicks Posted February 2, 2010 Posted February 2, 2010 Hi David - apologies, I should have clarified, this is from a licensing perspective. Okay, thanks. Just seems a bit odd to have a minimum limit. So, if we want to run 5 or more Windows VMs on a single-processor machine we have to buy multiple copies of Windows Server Enterprise Edition? -- David Hicks
KeithMPhoenix Posted February 2, 2010 Posted February 2, 2010 Indeed that is correct David. Hope this helps. 1
albertwt Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 Just to add to the earlier comments re 2008r2 - its worth noting that Datacenter can only be run on a server with a minimum of 2 Processors. That is why it is more make sense to get the Windows Server Data Center Edition for Unlimited VM deployment just once off payment of per physical CPU socket and hassle free :-)
pete Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 You can also use downgrade rights. A 2008 datacenter licence will let you run 2003 vms (for example), which is handy if migrating physical kit.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now