torledo Posted December 28, 2009 Posted December 28, 2009 Thought BT were waving the £125 reconnection now? When I moved in we didn't have a cable so I actually got to see where my £125 went, the guy had to sling a cable from the telephone pole to my house and connect everything up. i think it may now be less than £125 if there's no existing line going into the property. That's what my brother in-law was quoted from what i recall. The quote he got was inclusive of vat also. So all in all not terrible when you consider he has nothing going into the property, also the phone company he was going to go with had better customer service [in his view] than the alternative provider he was looking at, cheaper monthly line rental, free evening and weekend calls, and free calls to other friends and family using the same provider. Plus no contract tie-in as far as i'm aware......ok so no-ones going to throw in a tv package or lower the connection cost on acceptance of adding a tv package. But then again the basic pay cable tv packages aren't much to write home. been there, done that. I think that connection/install charge will pay itself back within a year compared to the alternative, plus he gets to deal with a decent provider. And he doesn't have to sign up to some direct debit, pay every month nonsense. A quarterly bill statement, with various options to pay the bill, as some people prefer. Plus the connection charge is not down to the provider he's dealing with, that's a BT charge that his provider doesn't make any money off of. I think it sounds excessive when it's just flicking a switch in the exchange but it's not unreasonable sum when there's no line going into the property.
torledo Posted December 28, 2009 Posted December 28, 2009 (edited) I had a friend go through this recently... it transpired that BT were the most expensive at re-activating/installing a line and that Sky or Virgin would happily pay the majority of the installation fee (obviously BT still did the job). presumably they'd make up their costs elsewhere. What did the rest of the deals from Sky and Virgin look like, line rental contract tie-in period ? Edited December 28, 2009 by torledo
Hightower Posted December 28, 2009 Author Posted December 28, 2009 Well I spoke to a Sky sales advisor and he said it would cost £39 to reactivate the phone line. Pretty happy with that - just gotta persuade the missus to get Sky HD in.
Ric_ Posted December 28, 2009 Posted December 28, 2009 Well I spoke to a Sky sales advisor and he said it would cost £39 to reactivate the phone line. Pretty happy with that - just gotta persuade the missus to get Sky HD in. ZeroHour will tell you Sky HD is amazing... personally, I think it's a rip off - a more expensive box plus an extra £10 a month just for the priviledge of receiving the channels you would normally get but in HD? PM me if you want referring to get yourself a free Sky+/Sky+HD box though. I think that I get some rubbish M&S vouchers out of the deal
Ric_ Posted December 28, 2009 Posted December 28, 2009 Oh yeah... coincidentally, my connection speed has suddenly risen to 1.2Mbps since my rant above!
kmount Posted December 28, 2009 Posted December 28, 2009 Oh yeah... coincidentally, my connection speed has suddenly risen to 1.2Mbps since my rant above! I'll take a pint as a thanks
YorkshireTechie Posted December 28, 2009 Posted December 28, 2009 having just recently moved into a property (September) i have just been through this process , firstly i was going to go with sky for broadband and was chuffed when they said they would reconnect the phone line for around £25 (i had heard of the dreaded £125 form BT) but was then told they could only offer me the sky connect package which was rubbish. in the end cutting a long story short i ended up with BT reconnecting the phone line and they did charge me £125 for flipping that bloody switch, i did argue the toss with them but to no avail they charged me anyway and then they sent me a letter saying thanks for agreeing to a 18month contract and because i had they would waive the reconnecting fee. all i can say about BT is be very careful i didnt see anything anywhere about a 18 month contract. and if you can get on cable jump on it i was with them for about ten years and never had any real problems with them, connection and downloads were spot on ( i would personally dig up my own path to get that gorgeous piece of fibre in)
kmount Posted December 29, 2009 Posted December 29, 2009 ( i would personally dig up my own path to get that gorgeous piece of fibre in) It's not fibre to your home; it's fibre to the cab (little green box).
YorkshireTechie Posted December 29, 2009 Posted December 29, 2009 oh i know, i had had a bit to drink and was being a bit silly
kmount Posted December 29, 2009 Posted December 29, 2009 Feel your pain nonetheless, I couldn't go back to adsl now.
Hightower Posted December 29, 2009 Author Posted December 29, 2009 I would love to get cable in - but it's not available They were digging up the road (Virgin Media) last year and laying it but it's not live yet - I wonder when it will go live in my area?
kmount Posted December 29, 2009 Posted December 29, 2009 I would love to get cable in - but it's not available They were digging up the road (Virgin Media) last year and laying it but it's not live yet - I wonder when it will go live in my area? Worth a ring?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now