pete Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 Essentially, pfy and myself believe that teachers should stick content in plain text / html / pdf rather than bunging their one page powerpoint slide onto moodle. Writing the stuff as a moodle resource means a kid clicks and it's there. Using power point = click - save - open if you have something that can handle .ppt. Lengthy documents (which would benefit from offline reading) should be .pdf - pdf readers are available freely. Does anyone know about the guidelines for such things? I'm hoping there's something that says "content must be accessible and not bundled into $proprietary_format that requires specific programs to access." Equal access and all that.
mrforgetful Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 Isn't PDF a proprietry format? We have to convert stuff to PDF for DiDA and it's a nightmare, PDF's are good for text and simple pictures, anything else and you get all sorts of problems.
pete Posted October 2, 2006 Author Posted October 2, 2006 @mr forgetful yes, but it's a better option that the teachers converting Office docs to html using office. Openoffice creates nice clean .pdfs IME. And "pdf" has become a bit "hoover" - everyone uses it and there's loads of free converters and readers.
CyberNerd Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 Theres some stuff in bectas technical specification about proprietry format, basically says openformat = good, proprietry = bad. Becta tell me this document is a contractural requirement for new PFI schools. hooray. http://schools.becta.org.uk/downloads/techspec_institutional_infrastructure.pdf Scorm is a good way to go with this, as scorm imports directly to moodle. There are a number of plugins for office that export scorm, sadly none for Ooo atm.
NetworkGeezer Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 PDF is a bit like Java. It is open but not free in the RMS sense. The author controls the standard but does not prevent interoperability.
Geoff Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 Er no. Not quite. To quote wikipedia: Anyone may create applications that read and write PDF files without having to pay royalties to Adobe Systems; Adobe holds a number of patents relating to the PDF format and claims that it is an open standard, licensing them on a royalty-free basis for use in developing software that complies with its PDF specification. Personally though, I'd use ODF.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now