Jump to content
EduGeek EdSec 2026 is Go! 27th Oct in Derby! Join us for a day of EdTech security focused talks, networking, and an evening social ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

It seems that Xenserver doesn't support jumbo frames, it certainly doesn't upto version 5 according to a citrix engineer on the forum. I can only find one reference to jumbo frames in the 5.5 admin guide which suggests that you can set it but i've found one post suggesting that it doesn't work and there's no mention of it on the citrix forum.

As my Sun SAN and HP switches support them it seems a shame that Xen doesn't.

 

Does anyone know different?

Posted
@cookie_monster: If you're using NFS, I think that jumbo frames becomes less relevant. The Sun iSCSI stack isn't as good as NFS either so NFS is surely the way to go?
Posted (edited)

Yes a good point I'm going to look into NFS today I realised that I can created a virtual disk in Xen and present it to a windows host which then will just see it as a D: drive. This will allow me to use FSRM without needing to map an iSCSI LUN with the Windows iSCSI initiator.

 

That's one reason why I was avoiding NFS to start with I'll have a play with NFS later. Any recommendations for setting up NFS for hosting VM's, I was told to carve iSCSI LUNS into multiple 250Gb partitions and no bigger as it reduces performance, any caveats like this with NFS?

 

I'll have to have a read up on NFS and frame sizes are jumbo frames less necssary as it's not sending out data that's been formated in NTFS cluster sizes? I've read so often that block level storage is way faster than file based that I just assumed iSCSI would be faster.

 

 

This makes interesting reading

 

Network File System (NFS) transfers data in 8,192-byte blocks. So adding room for headers, an attractive maximum Ethernet frame size for NFS applications is 9,000 bytes.

 

 

http://www.networkworld.com/forum/0223jumboyes.html

 

http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://docs.hp.com/en/783/jumbo_final.pdf&sa=U&start=6&ei=LWdlSva7B42NjAeT6_1S&usg=AFQjCNFd7Ntau6MOrRTKCFcHGE2bNUpJrA

 

So jumbo frame support could be usefull anyway once Xen supports it.

 

Cheers.

Edited by cookie_monster
Posted

BTW... see page 183 of the XenServer 5.5 Admin Guide:

 

Maximum Transmission Unit of the VIF in bytes. This parameter is read-only, but you can override the MTU setting with the mtu key using the other-config map parameter.

For example, to reset the MTU on a virtual NIC to use jumbo frames:

 

xe vif-param-set \
uuid= \
other-config:mtu=9000

 

Is your box in production yet? If not, could you perform a performance copmparison between iSCSI, iSCSI with jumbo frames, NFS and NFS with jumbo frames?

Posted (edited)

I had seen that section in the admin guide but there's very little info on it and I did see one post online about it causing a race condition on startup so I was being cautious.

 

If I get time I’ll run a comparison but it’s getting a bit frantic at the moment so I’m not sure I’ll get chance.

 

Do you use something like IOMeter for this?

Edited by cookie_monster

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...