cookie_monster Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 Hi all, i'm reading conflicting information on the network setup for Xenserver. I have two servers with 4 network cards i'd like to have 2 bonded cards to carry VM storage traffic and 2 bonded cards to carry general network traffic and the management interface. The problem is that i've seen this below in the xencenter docs. Note that a server with its management interface on a bond will not be permitted to join a pool. You will need to reconfigure the server's management interface and move it back on to a physical NIC before it can join a pool. but i've also seen this as well... Citrix recommends configuring management networks using a dedicated network interface or interfaces configured in a bond. The interface may be shared with VMs if desired; however, Citrix recommends separating VM, management, and storage traffic. So the question is if I configure a xenserver to have 2 cards for storage and another bond with 2 cards for general LAN traffic and the management interface will this cause issues when I add a second xenserver to the pool as indicated in the first quote? Anyone got a setup like this. I'm going to give it a try anyway so i'll post back with how I get on Cheers.
Willott Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 I don't have the storage interface (as we have Fibre), but I do have the management interface on a bonded nic which is shared with the VMs LAN traffic. And I have a pool running happily with 3 xen servers Cheers Will 1
Ric_ Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 I used to have the management interface shared on a bond but it wouldn't let me upgrade from 5.0 to 5.5 so I changed it - tbh, the single NIC I'm using for CIFS traffic isn't being stretched anyway. 2
Willott Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 Ah, that's a thought, I'm running 5.0 currently. I may do upgrade to 5.5 over the summer, so I'll see what happens then. Cheers
cookie_monster Posted July 8, 2009 Author Posted July 8, 2009 I used to have the management interface shared on a bond but it wouldn't let me upgrade from 5.0 to 5.5 so I changed it - tbh, the single NIC I'm using for CIFS traffic isn't being stretched anyway. Do you have a CIFS share on one of your xen units Ric_? I'm on 5.5 anyway so that should be ok. I'm just a bit worried that one Gb link might not be enough to handle the traffic it I had WSUS a file server and another (not sure what) server running on it. @ Will, i'll try bonding two including the management interface on the pool master and then add the second server to the pool and see what happens.
Ric_ Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 @cookie_monster: I currently have 14 VMs on XenServer (all sharing a pair of bonded NICS) and then I have a single NIC serving CIFS traffic.
cookie_monster Posted July 8, 2009 Author Posted July 8, 2009 Wow ok so you're running 14 VM's on one physical box, i'll not panic about my three VM's needing to share a 1Gb card yet then What are you using the CIFS share on the xenserver for if you don't mind me asking? I thought your storage was all on your SAN.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now