mdrabble Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 Quick question for those running Storage Spaces Direct Looking at a 3 node cluster running Storage Spaces Direct. Each Node will 4 x 4TB drives for storage But not sure if I should go with 2 x 2TB SSD drives or 2 x 960GB SSD Drives for the caching layer. What SSD sizes are other people using. Cheers
dhicks Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 But not sure if I should go with 2 x 2TB SSD drives or 2 x 960GB SSD Drives for the caching layer. Is there a significant difference in price, and/or any difference in performance between the two types of SSD drive? My guess is that the 960GB SSDs should be fine - I'd be surprised if the average school had 960GB of files in active use on a daily basis, which is what you want your fast-as-possible cache layer to be holding. 1
ultima170387 Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 In our 3 node cluster each server has 2 x 480GB SSDs with 6 1.8TB HDDs, all seems to work rather well with no performance issues. Ideally would have liked all SSD but over budget at the time 1
Jaan Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 (edited) 2 x 1TB SSD and 6 x 2TB SAS on each of our 3 nodes. Currently everything fits into the cache layer, so it's pretty speedy, although reads are also cached in a hybrid set up https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/storage-spaces/understand-the-cache Edited May 27, 2021 by Jaan 1
stevec_ Posted May 27, 2021 Posted May 27, 2021 Don't have experience with S2D yet myself, but when I was researching recently, MS Docs suggested the cache could be as little as 5% of the storage capacity for all SSD solutions and 10% for HDD solutions: Choosing drives for Storage Spaces Direct | Microsoft Docs
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now