GDPR CCTV clip to parent

[leegcvcc]

Me too! Desperately need something like that.

A colleague found one for £30. Not free, but it looks really good and quick. Movavi

Not been tested in anger nor read their Privacy statement but needed something quickly

[Roberto]

full retard

 

I'm not sure that throwing about offensive terms simply because others are more cautious than you is an effective way of making your point.

 

I don't think there's any reason to condemn others for being cautious in the light of new and far reaching legislation, especially when stuff that should already be in place, e.g. safeguarding, could easily apply to the scenarios being discussed.

Edited May 25, 2018 by Roberto

[mthomas08]

Showing a parent a CCTV image isn't going to worry anybody except those who are going full retard on GDPR

 

Not sure if I want to laugh or not.

 

You'll find there will be parents/students who takes it serious and know what their rights are. We've had biometrics for a number of years and I can tell you... those parents exist and will push their legal rights with threats. I can imagine what would have happened if we didn't follow compliance and asked for consent before we switched to bio.

 

Still if you don't care and willing to carry on.. fingers crossed your school doesn't get fined.. costing some ones job..

 

Again, there's no NEED for the parent to see the other, uninvolved, people. You are perfectly entitled to show CCTV of a child to that child's parent, but not the other people in the same clip. Hence the blurring.

 

You have to think of a CCTV recording as being data about each individual within it, not just "video of this incident". Each person within it is entitled to privacy.

 

Exactly. And the more parents/students start to understand their rights....

[mjk]

I'm not sure that throwing about offensive terms simply because others are more cautious than you is an effective way of making your point.

 

I don't think there's any reason to condemn others for being cautious in the light of new and far reaching legislation, especially when stuff that should already be in place, e.g. safeguarding, could easily apply to the scenarios being discussed.

 

It means backwards.

Edited May 25, 2018 by mjk

[mjk]

Not sure if I want to laugh or not.

 

You'll find there will be parents/students who takes it serious and know what their rights are. We've had biometrics for a number of years and I can tell you... those parents exist and will push their legal rights with threats. I can imagine what would have happened if we didn't follow compliance and asked for consent before we switched to bio.

 

Still if you don't care and willing to carry on.. fingers crossed your school doesn't get fined.. costing some ones job..

 

I never said I didn't care. I said that we were legally within our rights to show the video to parents. It is within the boundaries that are set out by the ICO. The school has informed students and parents that we will be doing this and there would not be a problem.

I'm not being flippant about this.

 

I do firmly believe everyone is overreacting massively and really needs to get a grip on reality. As others have stated - this is all covered in the current DPA and nobody has ever got fined or in trouble for showing a CCTV image to a parent, blurred or otherwise.