Jump to content

chrisfoster1971

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

About chrisfoster1971

  1. I hear where your coming from with this but as HPKP & HSTS becomes more prevalent MITM decrypt will be impossible. What are web security vendors doing to enable the industry and the like the ability to intelligently safeguard those who we are responsible for ? Personally I can't see how, without being hooked into GCHQ/NSA etc will we ever be truly able to inspect web traffic for any meaningful monitoring / reporting. Assuming that HPKP/HSTS in the not too distant future maybe we are destined to a hiding. This is making the move away from our current vendor ( not through choice ) extremely diffiucult as no one appears to actually fully able to converse what we are obliged to do. Ofsted themselves appear clueless, as long as you can prove that users are unable to get to obvious type web sites and you can report seems to suffice, but we know that isn't really the case these days. Be interested in others viewpoint.
  2. Out of interest how are people dealing with TLS/SSL traffic monitoring / filtering in the dawn of secure web searches? Are you concerned about the black hole of data ? Given the `prevent` guidelines Where students are logging into the educational network if monitoring SSL are you enforcing certificates on to their personal devices ? I believe we are expecting an inspection this year and trying to capture as much as possible to ensure that our technological solution is going to be compliant, or if we exceed requirements? Our web filtering solution is due to expire mid year so would also be really useful to get feedback as to working solutions that have been through an inspection and were proven to be excellent.
×
×
  • Create New...