Jump to content

cynlis

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

About cynlis

Personal Information

  • Occupation
    CTO
  • Location
    Weston, Florida

Employer (optional)

  • Company Represented
    WDCS, Inc.
  1. yes, outlook 2010 i am having exact same issue as darren
  2. http://staticc3.cdngeek.net/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by sukh http://staticc3.cdngeek.net/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png Done & yes, it works as expected. I think you should do the same test in your env, create 2 accounts and set permissions as requied, don;t set the Send-As as you dont want that. Just Send-on-Behalf. No membership in any groups other than domain users for both accounts. ________________________________________________________________ i have done the same thing and still have the same frustrating results. i am running server 2K8r2sp1 and exchange server 2010.
  3. the issue i have with send-on-behalf is that if the receiver is not using outlook, they will see "your" address not the "behalf" address.
  4. i am curious to know what those EMS commands do for you. let me know if you run/ran them.
  5. Nope, I surely did not change any list with the exception of hiding the address I am trying to sendas. But even before I hid it from the GAL I was experiencing the same issue. My set up is so basic. . . 45 email address, 1 is a postmaster account (is also a catch-all). While I am in my Outlook 2010, I want to be able to forward mail that comes to the postmaster as a result of the "catch-all" to the correct party. It's annoying to have to remove and re-type every time, and why should I have to? I know you know what I mean. I wanted to set/verify my setting so I ran these: Give user full mailbox rights: Add-MailboxPermission -Identity $mailbox -User $user -AccessRights 'FullAccess' Give user send-as rights to mailbox: Add-ADPermission -Identity $mailbox.DisplayName -User $user -ExtendedRights 'Send-as' Everything I have done so far says it should be working as EMS tells me "The appropriate access control entry is already present on the object" I've seen other blogs about this same issue with no resolve. However, I see that we are the only two that figured out removing the address and re-typing is a valid work around - a pain in the a*s, but still a work around. I'll keep searching. . . and if/when I find something, I will be sure to come back here to let you know.
  6. I don't thank that is the issue because I don't have any address lists and I have to remove and retype the "from" address every time too.
  7. Darren, We you able to get this sorted out? I am having the exact same issue and have been scouring the web to no avail.
×
×
  • Create New...