Jump to content

Leibnitz

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

About Leibnitz

Personal Information

  • Location
    Surrey
  1. Been using ivms most days, for many years. Running on various mid level PCs, no discrete gpu. It has been fine for me. A couple of the management team use it too. 10 NVRs 180 cameras, everything is Hikvision.
  2. Nice price for a Core Duo machine. Did you get Novatech to estimate battery life on that?
  3. I went with the same, except for the crucial last option and chose delete instead of move. Two reasons for that I suppose: 1. I'm prepared to risk losing a file and resorting to restoring a backup for the peace of mind I get from knowing any risky file is off my network. 2. I don't have the administration time to fully assess the accuracy of each identified threat so it would be left sitting in some toxic folder somewhere and, as I said in 1., I want this stuff off my network ASAP!
  4. Add warranty, I go for 3 years, and accidental damage cover. I don't get theft insurance. I'm considering a Laptop Staff Use Policy clause insisting on cover under their home insurance when they take it home. Don't fancy my chances of getting it supported by the SMT here though.
  5. I thought it was odd because that installer file you identified was the same as my own, it contains Dreamweaver stuff which had not been modified in forever. It's worth noting that Sophos say their recommended configuration for action to be taken when a virus is detected is 'Do Nothing'. It's their get out of jail free card at times like this when I pointed out their software has just disabled or deleted a load of valid files.
  6. This is NOT a virus outbreak. Sophos confirmed to me this morning that their IDEs were incorrectly identifying files as malware. The latest IDEs correct the problem. At least, that's what they say... Yes, just got the update through the enterprise library and deployed it. The files are no longer identified as mal/behav-043.
×
×
  • Create New...