I can understand how a HT could be tucked up with inappropriate hardware on the understanding that it was provided free.
What I fail to understand is how a financial institution would arrange a lease for a value far in access of the true value of the hardware. After all the hardware remains the property of the Leasing Company until the contract is complete.
All credit to Clydesdale Bank for cancelling the debts for schools effected by their contracts. I think their action is likely to be repeated by the larger banks as more publicity highlights this, in my opinion, malpractice.