Quinnzander

I wish.. I am a Justice Warrior. and I appear amongst all injustices. I call a spade a spade, and I thought I was reading the comments wrong, because it did seem like you all weren't taking the side of the person who won the court battle, when a court proved they were in the right. crimes are thrown out of court on a daily basis, it doesn't mean they didn't happen but they couldn't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Nothing in court is based on thoughts and feelings.. but facts and actualities. it's a court of law, not a kangaroo court.

Both love and war are fair games. If they had a case and a judge found that they had been treated unfairly beyond a reasonable doubt and gave Bromcom the victory, I believe we should draw attention to the elephant in the room. They were in the right in this particular case, and I don't believe this is how the forum is feeling. If I am not mistaken, people shouldn't be concerned about doing business with Bromcom as long as they intend to follow the rules. The law exists to shield businesses from these unethical actions. The fact that Bromcom is prepared to litigate these matters demonstrates how honorably Bromcom must behave.

I am confused did the ' disappointed bidder' win the legal dispute? so did they have a case? I think we should highlight the unfair play? otherwise that is victim shaming? no??