Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
does any one use this as an alternative to ghost i'm looking for a way to distribute my PC images on the cheap/free and have had a quick look but i can't get the dhcp server to give out ip addresses..
Posted

I tried it once and it did backup my test machine to my main machine at home :)

 

But then I couldn't restore it no matter what I tried :(

 

I keep trying all of these Ghost repalcement type tools out but none so far have both worked and been useful at the same time.

 

The main problem is usually dealing with NTFS partitions :(

 

 

regards

 

Simon

Posted
hi cybernerd i also tried this but can't get the ftp server part to work i think its to do with setting up a new user called install which i'm having a bit of a thick moment with.
Posted
The free space obviously compresses down to nearly zero (especially if you defrag before you image). How well the rest compresses depends on if you use gzip or bzip2. gzip is faster, but doesn't compress as well as bzip2.
Posted
in theory i agree but the install instructions ask for there to be a user called install and windows xp pro won't let me add users to the ftp site operators? i have come across this issue before but can't remeber a way around it.
Posted
I've used this on several servers and over 70 laptops:

sourceforge.net/projects/g4l

 

But how slow was the process :)

 

NTFS isn't an issue because it copies bit for bit. will compress and work from ftp server

 

It is an issue because the software has to transfer the whole partition and not just the active sectors in current use which Ghost does (because they paid MS the money for a license :) )

 

The free space obviously compresses down to nearly zero (especially if you defrag before you image).

 

The "free space" is only free if the software can understand the partition file system which AFAIK G4L can't :(

 

IF the free space is filled with a repeating pattern (say all zeros), then the compression algorithm stands some chance of compressing it to a small amount of data.

 

But in the real world, the free space contains lots of old rubbish and therefore doesn't get compressed and therefore data needed to be transferred to recreate the partition can be much larger than what you'd hope for :(

 

So as long as your prepared to zero all the byes in the empty space on the partition before cloning then maybe its usable :)

 

And for those who care about such matters, there is the slight issue of the G4U/G4L license infringement. As a GPL author I do care :)

 

My info is 6 months old so maybe somethings changed :)

 

regards

 

Simon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...