Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
So if you'd been cursing that lone 2003/2008 server in your shiny 2008 R2 deployment...

 

Are people really going to move Exchange 2007 from 2003/2008 to 2008R2? Suppose it's takes all sorts to make a world but I'm not sure I couldn't be bothered to do that as opposed to going to Exchange 2010 (or maybe it's successor) on 2008R2 some rainy day.

Posted

Dunno. There's been a few "we're upgrading to 2008R2 across the board......well, except for Exchange, which isn't supported yet, Grr" type posts on here and other forums.

 

Ours is on 2008 and I can't really see a reason to shift it to R2. If you were running virtual, had a lot of exchange servers on 2003 and everthing else was R2 and wanted to use memory / disk dedupe it may be worth it. But having said that, the primary ram use is holding the data store, which wouldn't dedupe well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...