EduGeek in the TES with your comments.

[Dos_Box]

Remember that nice journalist who was asking about if we'd been ripped by suppliers or contractors? Well, the article is up here on the TES: Schools being treated like 'an open chequebook', says NAHT - News - TES Connect

 

Schools being treated like 'an open chequebook', says NAHT

 

News | Published in The TES on 30 April, 2010 | By: Richard Vaughan

 

 

Union calls for inquiry into supply and repairs of IT equipment after uncovering 'dodgy practice'

 

Headteachers union the NAHT this week said it had uncovered evidence of the "dodgy practice" of schools being "ripped off" in the supply and maintenance of IT equipment.

 

Speaking ahead of its annual conference in Liverpool, the union has called for a "major inquiry" into the procurement of IT equipment, for fear of schools being treated like an "open chequebook" by companies.

 

In a report commissioned by the NAHT, schools and teachers have revealed they have been forced into buying equipment they do not need or become tangled in expensive contracts that end up costing the school thousands of pounds more than was needed.

 

The report quoted forum posts from EduGeek, a website for IT professionals working in schools, which listed a raft of examples of schools being taken for granted by companies. One IT expert said companies exploited teachers' lack of knowledge, charging vastly different sums from one teacher to the next.

 

The expert said: "I manage a college and several primary schools. The previous IT teacher was charged £3,500 (for an empty server cabinet) and £145 per network point. I was using the same installer at the same time at my previous college and they charged me £600 for the same cabinet and £45 per point.

 

"I also had a local authority-approved electrician try to charge £2,800 for five sockets for over-head projectors (the job was completed for £345 by another (electrician))."

 

The news comes just weeks after The TES revealed that a school had spent £250,000 on three photocopiers after becoming caught in expensive leasing arrangements.

 

Richard Spragg, an IT professional who runs a company offering support to primary schools, said he was often staggered by what he saw.

 

"When I go into schools, there are far too many companies that seem to treat them like an open chequebook," Mr Spragg said.

 

"Schools bring in IT companies and trust them to do things. But so often, I find that it has not been done properly."

 

NAHT general secretary Mick Brookes has called for a Which? guide for schools when it comes to IT procurement, claiming that the targeting of schools could become a "major scandal".

 

Mr Brookes said: "We believe that there should be a major enquiry into the provision of and maintenance of IT equipment."

 

A pretty well written and to the point article, which I feel just scratches the surface of this matter. Don't even get me started on the (now former) teacher I have found out about who spent £250,000 on IT equipment in a 5 year period in return for £10,000 of personal 'gifts'. This was a primary school. And a friends company.

 

Edited to add: You can download the report from the NAHT site here: http://www.naht.org.uk/welcome/resources/key-topics/ict/ripped-off-schools/

Edited May 1, 2010 by Dos_Box

[StewartKnight]

The article mentioned an IT Professional, but teachers are always telling me that the only professionals in schools are teachers. I'm confused ;-)

[elsiegee40]

The article mentioned an IT Professional, but teachers are always telling me that the only professionals in schools are teachers. I'm confused ;-)

 

ZH why haven't we got a :stirrer: smiley?!