Jump to content

Does Edugeek site need a Spring Clean revamp?  

44 members have voted

  1. 1. Does Edugeek site need a Spring Clean revamp?

    • Yes
      21
    • No
      12
    • Not bothered
      6
    • Really not bothered
      5


Recommended Posts

Posted

Some Signatures are getting rather big and annoying. Sponsor signatures are the exception in moderation as they do have to advertise themselves.

 

The About Us page is out of date as is this page The history of EduGeek.net

 

The direct support is a bit of a waste of time at the moment EduGeek.net - Direct Support are there no other links?

 

Is the user map used any more? EduGeek.net Forums - Googlemap ME

 

The calendar only shows Birthdays, nothing like conferences or BETT shows! Is there any other point to it? EduGeek.net Forums - Calendar

 

Just a few to be getting on with :)

  • Thanks 1
Posted
not too sure whats wrong with my sig chap , as a company representative its important for our sig to show contact details and a description of what we do, also if there are any particular offers.;)
Sure, I understand that, but when your sig is 8 lines long, and some of your posts are only one, it really breaks up the flow when reading. USENET guidelines were for sigs to be 4 lines max.

 

Simon Collins - Business Development Manager Could be your email link

Tel: 0845 249 1779 Mob: 07835 877044 One line

Computer Products Ltd - IT Hardware/Software/Consumables/Ruckus/Extricom/Meru Clicky link to CPLD

See What Edugeekers Say About CPLTD Clicky link; fourth line!

 

Not picking on just you, there are several others... Vikpaw!

Posted
Sure, I understand that, but when your sig is 8 lines long, and some of your posts are only one, it really breaks up the flow when reading. USENET guidelines were for sigs to be 4 lines max.

 

Simon Collins - Business Development Manager Could be your email link

Tel: 0845 249 1779 Mob: 07835 877044 One line

Computer Products Ltd - IT Hardware/Software/Consumables/Ruckus/Extricom/Meru Clicky link to CPLD

See What Edugeekers Say About CPLTD Clicky link; fourth line!

 

Not picking on just you, there are several others... Vikpaw!

 

point take i will adjust now fella:cool:

Posted

I wouldn't want to see the Behind the Red Door or General Chat forums axed, or moved to Facebook since I can't access Facebook from school. They do sometimes get out-of-hand, but equally, we need a place to ask non-technical question, e.g. job descriptions, pupil:teacher ratios, advice on disciplinary actions (to pick a few I've seen just today!). Okay, so there are also people asking for advice on what car to buy, but these can be easily screened and ignored if you're not interested / don't wish to post.

 

As for signatures, I don't mind ones like Simon's, as I understand that suppliers and sponsors need to give clear contact details. What annoys me more are the ones with pretty pictures, a "witty" quote, the spec of their home PC or their current score in some game or other. That said, what takes up even more screen space is all the gubbins on the left - the profile pic, join date, location, flags (why?!) and so on. Most of that info is useful, but could be smaller.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
I can see your point and part of me agrees. However, part of the edugeek community spirit is that we have got know each other outside the technical questions and it would be a shame to lose that because a few of of our many thousands can't behave themselves.

 

The behaviour problems are a symptom of the size of the community now and is demonstrated by Dos_Box having to go full time to manage it. I can see a time when we have employed Mods. The voluntary ones do a fantastic job, but they have home families and jobs to cope with too.

 

I agree, but my thoughts change depending on mood, and how much modding needs doing affects that.

 

Sure, I understand that, but when your sig is 8 lines long, and some of your posts are only one, it really breaks up the flow when reading. USENET guidelines were for sigs to be 4 lines max.

 

...

 

Not picking on just you, there are several others... Vikpaw!

 

point taken :p :troll:[whoops sorry - couldn't help myself, my finger slipped!]

Edited by vikpaw
Posted

Having read the replies and thinking about it a bit more I'd like to suggest that the front page (EduGeek.net) is set up as a "normal" website with a nice Web 2.0/3.0 welcoming look to it (as opposed to the inside of a server room that it looks like now :) ).

 

That way, all the geekiness goodies being promised can be put in as and when they arrive but we could get a quick win in the way our house looks to visitors :)

 

Also, if someone else (cough sysman :) ) was asked to do the front page - it could take a bit of load from ZeroHour.

 

regards

 

Simon

 

PS if would be nice if it looked OK on something less than a 2048x50000 resolution monitor as well :)

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Yeh a much nicer new frontpage is planned. VB 4 has a new CMS part which will handle it all and we hope to have much more news etc on it.

I will probably be looking for some extra testers close to the migration of the site to vb 4 so watch for the appeal post in the coming months.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...