Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We use scheduled commandreporter and custom reports to export timetable and student data from SIMS to be imported into other data systems.

 

In the same way, I would now like to create a custom report in SIMS.Net which reports AM/PM attendance marks for all students over a period of time (such as an academic year) and would like the report to export as XML, ideally in the following basic format (the xml tags are hypothetical):

 

session =”pm” mark=”\” />

Etc. etc.

Etc. etc.

 

Is anyone aware of a way to do this?

Posted

As with the existing reports, the report would be set to export as XML onto a location on the SIMS server and would be run via commandreporter at scheduled times. A few minutes later, the resulting XML file is then read from a script which updates a SQL Server DB.

 

The idea will be that we use that data (in the SQL Server DB) to provide attendance data on a future parent portal (aka online reporting) and potentially on existing data systems such as progress tracking and student learner profile.

Posted

I don't have SIMS running from home at the moment (long story) so I can't look at the reporting tree, but it should be feasible.

 

Attendance in general is certainly possible; AM/PM split may be, or at least you could export all the attendance marks and aggregate the data outside of SIMS if need be, although that way would be fairly inefficient.

 

I'm exporting our attendance data as summaries, in order to import previous attendance data into assessment aspects (since you can't show what we want in a marksheet otherwise) and it can be done, one way or another.

 

If you're doing it for online reporting, though, there is a strong case for using something like SLG, as the authentication issues involved are solved that way. "Rolling your own" auth mechanism is doable, but to make it really robust is a whole other matter! Many LAs, and certainly Capita themselves, offer a hosted SLG service, which would allow you to show data without having to worry about the implementation side.

Posted (edited)
What's wrong with SLG2

 

That's probably the wrong question since we're looking at what we want to achieve first, then what the best solution to that requirement is. We are currently gathering requirements but it is possible that SLG2 won't meet our Requirements Specification and in addition is pretty expensive. Finally, our LA appear to have put a (presumably) cheaper LA hosted SLG2 solution firmly on the back burner.

 

As I say, we are only at the stage of gathering requirements and assessing feasibility at this point.

Edited by u8dmtm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...