Guest Guest Posted July 31, 2020 Posted July 31, 2020 We have a new member of staff starting in September who is Dyslexic and requires an application to assist her. We have a single user license, which can be installed school wide as long as we lock down usage to this user. I've created rules in Applocker to block access to all users and added an additional rule allowing this user access. However, access is still being blocked. I realise I could get around this by creating a new security group with everyone bar this member of staff in, but I'd rather not do this. Has anyone had any experience of this scenario? Any help is greatly appreciated
free780 Posted July 31, 2020 Posted July 31, 2020 Basically a deny rule takes Precedent. If the app is going on all devices, is it not installed in Program Files? Other than that you could create an Allow rule for the user, ideally for a certificate as long as the app is signed.
Guest Guest Posted July 31, 2020 Posted July 31, 2020 The app is in Program Files. I have a rule denying executables from the applications folder and a rule allowing for the user who requires access. However, the user still gets denied access
Steve21 Posted July 31, 2020 Posted July 31, 2020 As mentioned above the deny will take precedence. AppLocker works in reverse to SRP. Why not just remove the block on the application folder, and only give that user the shortcut? Steve
Guest Guest Posted July 31, 2020 Posted July 31, 2020 I got this working with app locker. I added a path exception to the default allow all in program files rule and created a rule allowing the app for the user who requires it
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now