Ryan Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 One of my colleagues is getting lots of mail like the following: From: System Administrator Sent: 31 March 2008 10:01 To: Subject: Undeliverable: {Spam?} Óïðîùåííàÿ ñèñòåìà íàëîãîîáëîæåíèÿ â 2008 ã. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: {Spam?} Упрощенная система налогообложения в 2008 г. Sent: 31/03/2008 08:12 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [email protected] on 31/03/2008 10:04 The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address. From: System Administrator Sent: 31 March 2008 12:01 To: Subject: Undeliverable: *****SPAM***** Hermes Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: *****SPAM***** Hermes Sent: 01/04/2008 05:19 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [email protected] on 31/03/2008 11:58 The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. < mail1.nrgnetworks.com #5.0.0 smtp; 550 unknown user > It obviously looks like it's being bounced back to here. Is it likely her machine is zombified, or is it just speculative spam? It's coming from all over the place. Bottom line, how do i stop it? She's getting about 30 per day atm.
Ric_ Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 Those messages do look like bounce backs... her machine isn't being used as a relay is it? Get the AV and AS tools out!
DMcCoy Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 Sometimes the domain or address is used, I've had over 4000 bounced back in a single day before, and it certainly wasn't a compromised machine.
Ryan Posted April 7, 2008 Author Posted April 7, 2008 AV came back clean (McAfee 8.5). I'll try a SpyBot search today methinks. Is there a way to check Exchange to see if her account is indeed sending out those emails initially?
Ric_ Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 @Ryan: You can use message tracking to see what mail has been sent from her account.
Ryan Posted April 7, 2008 Author Posted April 7, 2008 I've turned on message tracking to see if that yields anything. Thanks Ric @DMcCoy - how did you resolve that? Or did you?
ZeroHour Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 @DMcCoy - how did you resolve that? Or did you? There is nothing you can do if a spammer spoofs email to come from your domain. You just need to control the NDR messages really.
Ryan Posted April 7, 2008 Author Posted April 7, 2008 You just need to control the NDR messages really. Go on...
Geoff Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 There is nothing you can do if a spammer spoofs email to come from your domain. You could implement SPF. SPF: Project Overview
ZeroHour Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 @Geoff: SPF is still considered fairly toothless. Not many truely use it to weight against a server. I have used SPF in the past and even when I break the SPF (so it read "fail" in the header) the email still does not get filtered. @Ryan: there is not much you can do to block NDR's as you still need them for real NDR. Just educate the staff saying if you receive a bounce and didnt send anything, ignore it generally.
Ryan Posted April 7, 2008 Author Posted April 7, 2008 Hmm. It may be time to bite the bullet and give her an alternate email address then. Cheers lads.
Geoff Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 @Geoff: SPF is still considered fairly toothless. Not many truely use it to weight against a server. I have used SPF in the past and even when I break the SPF (so it read "fail" in the header) the email still does not get filtered. I do, because I have an up to date Spam Assassin installation. It will factor in SPF information in it's 'spaminess' score. While I agree SPF isn't the perfect solution, it's one of the best ones on the table at the moment. So unless you can come up with a better idea, what's the problem with implementing it. Even if it doesn't get rid of all the spam, it'll cut down on a percentage.
JamesC Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 @Geoff: SPF is still considered fairly toothless. Not many truely use it to weight against a server. I have used SPF in the past and even when I break the SPF (so it read "fail" in the header) the email still does not get filtered. I have implemented it, and I know for a fact it is used by hotmail servers. When I have tested it and it blocks email fine. Perhaps you misconfigured your spf record?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now