Disease Posted January 29, 2015 Posted January 29, 2015 I am taking the steps of experimenting with Vlans. I have created 2 extra Vlans in addition to the default Vlan1 on my layer 3 switch. I can get the 2 new Vlans communicating each other which I suspect is because they are on the same Subnet (again all new to me), I am unable however to communicate with devices on the default Vlan which is a different subnet. I have attached the route table for the switch, can anyone give me a nudge in the right direction on how I get the Vlans to communicate with the default Vlan. Cheers
Gaz Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 What make switch is that taken from? Some default VLANs are non routeable. 1
Gaz Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Do you need to create a route entry for the 192 range to the 10 range? I'm still learning about vlans and routing myself so I'm probably not much help. A static route of 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1 (or whatever your internet gateway IP is) would route all traffic to the internet maybe that is what you are after?
Disease Posted February 9, 2015 Author Posted February 9, 2015 (edited) I am looking to implement vlans for segments of my network in the summer to reduce broadcast traffic, so I was just experimenting with multiple vlans on a switch and was struggling to understand why I could ping vlan 53 and 52 from each other but not vlan 1. Edited February 9, 2015 by Disease
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now