Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

I am just looking at deploying the latest adobe flash. For machines that are x64 and use both x32 and x64 IE would you install both x32 and x64 versions of flash or just x64 please?

 

Thanks

Posted (edited)

Generally for Java you only need the x86 version for x64 operating systems if only 32-bit programs use it, it depends on what architecture the programs is written for.

 

Generally 32-bit complied programs use the x86 JRE, and 64-bit compiled programs the x64 JRE. Same applies for browsers regarding the JRE plugin. For example, LibreOffice is a 32-bit program, so it uses the 32-bit JRE even on Windows 7 x64.

Edited by dhoward_westexetc
fixed poor sentence structure
Posted
Generally for Java you only need the x86 version for x64 operating systems if only 32-bit programs use it, it depends on what architecture the programs is written for.

 

Generally 32-bit complied programs use the x86 JRE, and 64-bit compiled programs the x64 JRE. Same applies for browsers regarding the JRE plugin. For example, LibreOffice is a 32-bit program, so it uses the 32-bit JRE even on Windows 7 x64.

 

But if your using x64 IE you will need x64 Java.

Posted
Spot on. But even on Win 7 x64 I still use the 32-bit IE (when I use IE) as I find that is more responsive, and that needs the 32-bit Java plugin. Likewise 64-bit Firefox, for example, will need 64-bit JRE when it is released fully.
Posted
Didnt know there was a 64bit firefox. I am struggling to get a x64 msi installer for java

 

There are 64-bit nightly builds, but they're development builds. Waterfox is also based on an x64 nightly and is located on sourceforge.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
I am struggling to get a x64 msi installer for Java

1.7.0.1: www.filehippo.com/download_jre_64/

1.6.0.29: www.filehippo.com/download_jre_64/10809/

 

I still use the 32-bit IE as I find that is more responsive

This will be fixed in Internet Explorer 10. :)

 

Internet Explorer 9 (32-bit) features a faster JavaScript engine than Internet Explorer 8's, internally known as Chakra. Chakra has a separate background thread for compiling JavaScript. Windows runs that thread in parallel on a separate core when one is available. Compiling in the background enables users to keep interacting with webpages while Internet Explorer 9 generates even faster code. By running separately in the background, this process can take advantage of modern multi-core machines.

 

[...]

 

The 64-bit version of Internet Explorer 9, which is not the default browser even on 64-bit systems, does not have the JIT compiler and performs up to 4 times slower. (Source)

Edited by Arthur
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1.7.0.1: www.filehippo.com/download_jre_64/

1.6.0.29: www.filehippo.com/download_jre_64/10809/

 

 

This will be fixed in Internet Explorer 10. :)

 

Yay! Maybe web browsing with a 64-bit web browser will finally be viable!

 

You can also install the JRE on a PC, then go to the LocalLow folder, and an MSI and associated cab will be there in the Sun Folder. I know that is the case certainly for the x86 one, I have no experience of the 64-bit one though.

Posted
I have no experience of the 64-bit one though.

The 64-bit MSI gets extracted to the same location. The folder just has an "_x64" on the end.

 

%UserProfile%\AppData\LocalLow\Sun\Java\jre1.6.0_29_x64
%UserProfile%\AppData\LocalLow\Sun\Java\jre1.7.0_01_x64

  • Thanks 1
Posted
The 64-bit MSI gets extracted to the same location. The folder just has an "_x64" on the end.

 

%UserProfile%\AppData\LocalLow\Sun\Java\jre1.6.0_29_x64
%UserProfile%\AppData\LocalLow\Sun\Java\jre1.7.0_01_x64

Makes perfectly good sense to me!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...