CAM Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 You can view the page at http://www.edugeek.net/content.php?r=261-BSF-Court-Decision-Announced
AyatollahPies Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 Gove's actions were considered unlawful on the grounds that he failed "to discharge relevant statutory equality duties under the Sex Discrimination Act, Race Relations Act and Disability Discrimination Act. Exqueese me? Baking powder? UK.gov's axing of school building plan 'unlawful' ? Channel Register
uk101man Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011)
uk101man Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 Offical Judgment : Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011)
vikpaw Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 You gotta love the legal spiel Cases involving torture, persecution or other grave threats to human rights require anxious scrutiny; but this is not such a case and, as the claimants are themselves public authorities, no human rights issues arise.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now