Switch Replacement - Best Network Map

[rjf2019]

Looking to replace a network switch that has recently died - we are muddling through in the meantime. Which would you opt for, and why?

 

Option One​

This requires the replacement of the network cabinet as it is particuarly shallow. It's an added cost, but one that can be afforded. It is my preferred option as keeping a simple network as simple as possible and means that data travelling from one downstairs location to another (e.g. a PC to a photocopier) can do so across the same switch.

 

 

​Option Two​

 

 

I would welcome any feedback because, as well as coming to a decision, I'd like this to be a useful learning experience for me also. TIA.

[FN-GM]

This is quite a simple network. from a technical point of view wouldn't really matter what design you choose.

 

Personally though I would pick option 1. It's a more simple design and traffic between the 2 24 port switches wouldn't need to go via the core as it will be on the same switch.

[mavhc]

Why will you have to replace the cabinet?

[bald_pig]

Why will you have to replace the cabinet?

 

He says that the cabinet is too shallow.

[mavhc]

But 48 port and 24 port HP switches are the same depth

[rjf2019]

But 48 port and 24 port HP switches are the same depth

I have the JL384A coming in at 24.6cm . The 48 port version is around 32cm

[mavhc]

Ah, PoE versions, annoying.

 

Long term a larger cabinet is better, but I wouldn't worry about the longer path for the packets unless you have data showing the trunk ports will be near maximum capacity.

 

SNMP log the current traffic flows