Ric_ Posted July 1, 2005 Posted July 1, 2005 Was reading about this in IT Week the other day. Here's a snippet from the cable guy. The upshot in IT Week was that it was OK for heterogenous windows domains but add any other client and you're screwed. If this is the case you should buy a third party tool for managing security.
StewartKnight Posted July 1, 2005 Posted July 1, 2005 if this guy is telling us how to WiFi, shouldn't he be Cableless Guy???!!!???
Geoff Posted July 1, 2005 Posted July 1, 2005 The upshot in IT Week was that it was OK for heterogenous windows domains but add any other client and you're screwed. Linux will work ok in a windows domain with WPA2 or WPA2-PSK provided you set it up correctly (Samba, WPA-Supplicant, correct encryption kernel modules, etc). Linux has been able to run WPA2 for some time thanks to work over at the HostAP. One must be careful of which hardware is used. As the MS article points out, some chipsets are incapable of processing WPA2 encrypted data in a timely fashion. Linux has managed to make a few of the older chipsets work (check the hostAP site for a list) because they allow the encryption work to be offloaded to the PC's CPU but its a bit hit and miss generally.
Ric_ Posted July 1, 2005 Author Posted July 1, 2005 What I meant was that the article implied that the new systems from Microsoft became a nightmare to configure for multiple types of hardware if you have differetn client-types.
plexer Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 WPA2 update now available for XP SP2. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/917021.mspx Ben
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now