Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not sure if this is the right section for this or not, but looking for recommendations (NOTE: this is not my area of expertise). Recently took over a network that currently has 4 (maybe 5) IIS installations. I've always lived by the thought that less is more meaning that I've tried to run everything on a single IIS implementation to reduce the update/management overhead and the security footprint. So my question is...which is better? Less or more? Pros/cons for either way?

 

Background: we only allow OWA traffic inbound from the outside. All other IIS traffic is internal. If I recall correctly we have OWA, 3 or 4 DB applications that are utilizing IIS as a frontend, and a management software. So, we currently have IIS installed on the Exchange server, IIS installed on 2 SQL servers, IIS installed on a backup server, and one other one if I recall correctly.

I know (or at least I think) that 2 IIS servers will need to be running. We've recently upgraded a DB application that requires .NET 4.5 and an older DB application that was running on the same IIS server requires .NET 3.5.

Any and all input is appreciated!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...