<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title/><link>https://www.edugeek.net/blogs/blog/72-cybernerds-blog/</link><description/><language>en</language><item><title>Office 365 Exchange Online now 50GB Mailbox per user!</title><link>https://www.edugeek.net/blogs/entry/892-office-365-exchange-online-now-50gb-mailbox-per-user/</link><description><![CDATA[<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="techie08" data-cite="techie08" data-ipsquote-contentapp="blog" data-ipsquote-contenttype="blogs" data-ipsquote-contentid="892" data-ipsquote-contentclass="blog_Entry"><div><blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="CyberNerd" data-cite="CyberNerd" data-ipsquote-contentapp="blog" data-ipsquote-contenttype="blogs" data-ipsquote-contentid="892" data-ipsquote-contentclass="blog_Entry"><div>This is the sort of self-centred approach that causes entire school <abbr title="Information and Communications Technology">ICT</abbr> systems to be outsourced.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p>
Why is it self centred and why would it cause Entire <abbr title="Information and Communications Technology">ICT</abbr> systems to be outsourced?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p>
The post showed (tongue in cheek, I hope) that s/he wanted to use a particular system - not because of any benefit to the school, but so s/he could learn to use it in order to move on to a job in industry. IMO this is self centered and detrimental to the school. Anyone who is going to choose X over Y because it will help them get a job somewhere else doesn't deserve to be an educationalist. </p><p>
Any head teacher or governing body who was being dictated to by a technician should have them sacked. Outsourcing is a pretty efficient way of sacking someone in a restructure, so it's the most common method.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">892</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:27:40 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
