<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title/><link>https://www.edugeek.net/blogs/blog/1401-midiwifes-blog/</link><description/><language>en</language><item><title>BETT show</title><link>https://www.edugeek.net/blogs/entry/805-bett-show/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>Well, today I visited the BETT show at Excel in London and, as a result, today I joined EduGeek.</p><p>
I wonder what other BETT show visitors made of it?</p><p> </p><p>
I made a beeline for and particularly enjoyed the event 'Technology and How We Learn' where Armand D'Angour, Bette Chambers and Susan Greenfield gave us their take on what 'educational software/programming' ought to be aiming for. Highly though provoking.</p><p>
Brave and outspoken, I particularly enjoyed Bette Chambers (Uni York and Johns Hopkins) urging us delegates to ask of the tech gizmo exhibitors - what proof do you have that your product actually makes a positive difference to learning? </p><p> </p><p>
She added that investment in marketing will yield more remunerative payback than investment in robust scientific investigation.... How sad and how true.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">805</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:48:54 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
