-
VLAN Sanity Check Please
Hi All,
I am in the process of setting out / planning the VLANs I am going to implement over the holidays.
Could someone check that I have my IP schemes OK ?
VLAN 1 (Management)
IP Range: 192.168.48.0 - 192.168.51.255
Netmask: 255.255.252.0
CIDR: 192.168.48.0/22
Maximum Hosts: 1022
Network ID: 192.168.48.0
Broadcast ID: 192.168.51.255
VLAN 2 (Admin)
IP Range 192.168.52.0 - 192.168.55.255
Netmask: 255.255.252.0
CIDR: 192.168.52.0/22
Maximum Hosts: 1022
Network ID: 192.168.52.0
Broadcast ID: 192.168.55.255
VLAN 3 (Curric)
IP Range 192.168.56.0 - 192.168.59.255
Netmask: 255.255.252.0
CIDR: 192.168.56.0/22
Maximum Hosts: 1022
Network ID: 192.168.56.0
Broadcast ID: 192.168.59.255
VLAN 4 (Wireless)
IP Range 192.168.60.0 - 192.168.60.255
Netmask: 255.255.255.0
CIDR: 192.168.60.0/24
Maximum Hosts: 254
Network ID: 192.168.60.0
Broadcast ID: 192.168.60.255
VLAN 5 (VoIP)
IP Range 192.168.61.0 - 192.168.61.255
Netmask: 255.255.255.0
CIDR: 192.168.61.0/24
Maximum Hosts: 254
Network ID: 192.168.61.0
Broadcast ID: 192.168.61.255
VLAN 6 (Media)
IP Range 192.168.62.0 - 192.168.62.255
Netmask: 255.255.255.0
CIDR: 192.168.62.0/24
Maximum Hosts: 254
Network ID: 192.168.62.0
Broadcast ID: 192.168.62.255
Many thanks
-
Looks alright to me, I would suggest starting VLAN5 at .62 if there is any chance of a larger wifi deployment which will give you a little extra space to be able to extend the wireless segment in future without having to move the other subnets or make the address space non continuous for Wireless.
-
Hmmmm you have a point about VLAN 4 I may increase that to 1022 hosts also may look like overkill but as you say room for growth seeing as I have just added another 3 Thin AP's and plan to launch public wireless access. :)