Don't forget Ruckus!
We're looking a number of wifi solution to provide wifi coverage to the approximatly 600 students in our boarding houses.
Obviously coverage is a key issue for us as the boarding houses are much more like hotels in construction than classrooms e.g. lots of little rooms spread over several floors. At least one boarding house is a classic old building with big thick walls.
We have a network access controller (Bradford campus manger) which we need to work with the wireless.
The front runners currently seem to be Meru and Xirrus, would be especially interested to hear any feedback good or bad about these solutions, especially if your using a Campus Manager.
Don't forget Ruckus!
How much bandwidth do you have to share with your 600 boarders?
Throwing a £20k system at a bunch of boarders that only have limited Internet capability seems a bit of an overkill to me!
If you need to service all 600 users from the same few AP's your looking in he right place however if your only going to have a dozen or so clients attached to each AP sharing a 100 Mbps leased line the likes of a 16 radio Xirrus unit is possibly a bit over specified?
Think very carefully about how you are actually going to use it, trial it first before committing to it.
Been playing with Meraki over the last few days seems really good. The controller is cloud based and therefore pretty much plug and play (getting config from the internet).
Access points are also fairly robust with decent signals.
Last edited by glennda; 28th May 2012 at 07:19 PM.
If you're going for a controller based solution, it's better to go for a physical device on site IMO, it's less likely to go down that your net pipe.
I have PM'd.
Get a survey done....I suspect Xirrus will do this very well....
Depending on what you have, one Xirrus AP could do 600 devices easy.....but then things like geography (coverage) play a big part which may cause an issue for you....and you may find a solution like Meru or Ruckus may work better....
What is your backend like? 1 GB ? 10GB? you may need to take into account the load on the network and the types of traffic you are expecting as well...if 100MB then web traffic would be viable but not much else...
For my situation, Meru and Ruckus were not close....
it's worth mentioning that the new Ruckus 7982 AP's can handle extremely high density deployments i.e. 500 concurrent connections, plus when coupled with FlexMaster is ideal for multisite deployments for the full details have a look at Ruckus brings out beast
Keeping controllers in house or in the cloud will be a long debate for any facet of networking. But more and more applications have been moving to the cloud such as Google Apps for Education, Live @ Edu. If you had your own internal mail server you could keep mail services up for your organization, but the idea of managing an extra server, backing it up locally, managing that, power, etc.. it is often easier and cheaper to just do it in the cloud. In many cases it also adds functionality to what you could have internally because it is a shared resource and shared funding. Plus it saves you a lot of headache. Who wants to manage and maintain an Exchange server? That said, a wireless controller is something I would happily put in the cloud.
The data traffic is processed internally in the WAP. The cloud provides a management interface and a means for the APs to get updates. If you have an outage at a data center some services in the cloud controller may be done temporarily, but everything critical continues to run on site as it was before the controller went down. Your local controller (if no HA unit) going down would cause far greater issues and far more downtime. Whereas with Meraki your data is replicated within the data center itself and then to another data center as well. Less opportunity for downtime. If your internet connection goes down you're out of luck anyway. Local traffic and authentication will continue to operate. We haven't had an outage with Meraki, but I have done testing while setting up ACLs on the VLANs and it works like a champ without access to the cloud controller. You can't tell the difference except for the lack of internet, which you'd have anyway.
Most people don't have redundant wireless controllers anyway so the point of failure is greater. I build my network to be as redundant as possible, but if there is an ISP outage the last thing I'm worried about is creating new wireless policies.
Last edited by SuperfluousAdjective; 11th September 2012 at 02:16 AM.
Why not just go with something like the Aruba IAP series which virtualizes the controller inside the APs themselves. It just elects one as the master and the rest follow, if it goes down another one takes over being the master. As long as you have one AP up it is managed and you can configure anything with full management. Way more resilient as the only way you have no management is if you have no APs, at that point what does it matter.
Even the Ruckus APs will still keep running without the controller and authenticate via static means, its not a massively special feature.
Meraki offers pretty steep educational discounts (think 50% or more). The controller/license fee includes warranty and support.. 24/7/365 next day shipment of any failed product. Their controller/license/warranty fee was actually cheaper than a lot other bids we received that had the added cost of a controller (only one, no redundancy). The cloud controller also includes a lot of great reporting/monitoring features common in other controllers as well as Apple mobile device management and some other really useful features we make use of in our network. We didn't choose Meraki because they had a cloud based controller, although it was a nice to have. They have some interesting features in their cloud controller that we make use of. They performed well in our tests and their price was extremely competitive. We don't expect to have any wireless system for more than 5 years so investing in a controller doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. With these it is just a 1-1 swap. The Cat6 lines are run, the mounts are installed. APs hung. When we want to do a refresh we just pull the old down and upgrade to the new... preferably again without a controller. With the way networking is progressing I can't imagine wireless controllers will be around much longer. There isn't much point to it. Wireless management will move to the cloud, virtual appliances or they'll become internal. But the days of buying a hunkin box to manage access points are numbered.
I never said running without connection to a controller was a massively special feature. I was just saying that you were wrong when you said you can't authenticate to the network if a Meraki AP loses its connection to the controller. That's false. Nowhere did I state that Aruba or Ruckus did not provide useful features or a fine product. Although, after you brought up the Aruba Instant AP line I do stand by my statement that it is meant more for a small branch office and not an enterprise environment.
Last edited by SuperfluousAdjective; 11th September 2012 at 05:18 AM.
You are right the IAP series does have its limits, it does sound like the cloud ones may have some of the same issues you were talking about though, if they are disconnected from the controller but still run the featureset surely they are doing something very similar to the IAP series so may be subject to some of the same overheads with CPU and resources.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)