Wireless Networks Thread, DHCP in Technical; I have noticed on here that alot of people are using DHCP through servers, we use routers for the dole ...
16th January 2011, 02:27 PM #1
I have noticed on here that alot of people are using DHCP through servers, we use routers for the dole out of IP's using dhcp pools, we have 2 Cisco 2600's for DHCP and they dole out the addresses for tftp pxe boot too.
At the moment we have both AD and Netware (eDirectory) running on the network - so is there a right and wrong regarding what you use for DHCP ? I know it has a lot of overhead on the routers but these routers were already installed with this role when I got here they seem to do nothing but dole out IP's, it seems to work no problem we've had the AD and Netware go down due to a power failure, but because the DHCP routers where on a different circuit all the hosts still got addresses and internet access.
Does it matter - is there a better way of doing it ? - I like having it through the routers actually you cant beat IOS
16th January 2011, 02:45 PM #2
The only reason I can see why using M$ DHCP would be better for AD clients will be the Dynamic updates that MS can do that your switches won't!
I use Microsoft DHCP on my AD clients and Sonicwalls DHCP for the various routed subnets with non AD clients such as tills, press wifi, IP CCTV
The private ESSID wifi uses VLan routing and DHCP Relay from the MS server for my roaming AD clients.
This makes sure my DNS and RDNS lookups are consistent in AD which is vital for policy and sophos deployment.
16th January 2011, 02:52 PM #3
No major difference, if the routers can handle it and do all you need them to then there is no harm in using them. The benifits of having it on the server are mostly for quicker updates of DNS and ease of configuration/reduction in devices/power usage.
Thanks to SYNACK from:
cpjitservices (16th January 2011)
16th January 2011, 02:57 PM #4
Thanks Dude, was just wondering really - I'm not entirely sure how we have our DNS, I think that is also in one or 2 of the routers - we have a stack of 2600's with different roles for different sites and I think one of them does the DNS for the LAN & WAN.
17th January 2011, 01:11 AM #5
For AD to work propperly without a bunch of additional hassle you really need to be running DNS on a AD machine so that it can publish all of its records easily, you can do it with a different DNS server but it is much more hassel.
Originally Posted by cpjitservices
By mcowley in forum Windows Server 2000/2003
Last Post: 5th July 2010, 10:06 AM
By siuko in forum O/S Deployment
Last Post: 24th October 2009, 08:05 PM
By TechSupp in forum O/S Deployment
Last Post: 27th September 2009, 01:50 AM
By kevin_lane in forum Windows
Last Post: 24th September 2008, 09:39 AM
By kingswood in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 7th September 2005, 06:29 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)