+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Wireless Networks Thread, Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation in Technical; Removed....
  1. #1

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    8,798
    Thank Post
    351
    Thanked 1,274 Times in 870 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1126

    Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    Removed.

  2. #2

    Ric_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,590
    Thank Post
    109
    Thanked 762 Times in 593 Posts
    Rep Power
    180

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    Is it possible that you are multicasting across all the sites when you image the machines?

    It may be a good idea to make sure that the three networks are on 3 different subnets... at least this way the traffic won't 'leak' between schools.

  3. #3

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    8,798
    Thank Post
    351
    Thanked 1,274 Times in 870 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1126

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    Removed.

  4. #4

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    9,930
    Thank Post
    1,337
    Thanked 1,781 Times in 1,105 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    594

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    Directed broadcast is actually a function of Multicast really ... but designed for networks that span more than one subnet or not able to multicast ... but is still pushing packets to each and every machine.

    If you are using GhostCast server (not sure in V7.5) then you can throttle this ...

    Or you can go back to multicast and just turn off broadcast packets at your switch (should be relatively easy on 3Com and HP kit ... rtfm though) for those rooms that are not being imaged. We have had to do this before when using PowerCast (part of DeployCentre whcih was bought up by Symantec to be included in newer versions of Ghost).

    Some information on data throttling is available here.

  5. #5

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    8,798
    Thank Post
    351
    Thanked 1,274 Times in 870 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1126

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    Thanks GrumbleDook,

    For clarity we do not use the Ghost Console. At the server the image is served out from the Command Prompt. The article does look interesting, but I wil not be able to check things until tomorrow, as I am not at school at the moment.

  6. #6

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    8,798
    Thank Post
    351
    Thanked 1,274 Times in 870 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1126

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    OK I had an idea overnight and here it is: Server3 (S3) is the Ghost server. It has two jobs: Ghost image serving and hop on point for Our supplier. I can get Our supplier to join at Server1 (S1) when required. This leaves S3 just doing Ghost. I propose that I move S3 to a new domain, say OurDomain2, on a private IP range and separate subnet mask.

    When imaging the traffic then won't bleed across the networks and although the amount of traffic on the stuctured cable network is the same OurDomain1, OtherSchoolDomain1, OtherSchoolDomain2, ConsortiumDomain,.... all ignore the traffic because it doesn't relate to them.

    Is this idea going to work if I put it in place?

  7. #7

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    9,930
    Thank Post
    1,337
    Thanked 1,781 Times in 1,105 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    594

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    A tad complicated ...

    I am trying to remember back to someone with a similar situation ... it might have been in the newsgroups (probably uk.education.schools-it).

    They put a second NIC in the Ghost server and had all ghost traffic going through that. That NIC went to a second VLAN. When they wanted to image a machine they put the port it went into onto the 'imaging' VLAN and the VLAN was throttle so as not to hammer the network ... I have no idea what kist they were using on the network but it was obviously managed ... is this a possible option for you?

  8. #8

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    8,798
    Thank Post
    351
    Thanked 1,274 Times in 870 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1126

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    Could be: The server already has two network cards in: Break up the teamed cards and move one card over to the new IP range and get that to handle the Ghosting sessions (?)

  9. #9


    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,411
    Thank Post
    184
    Thanked 356 Times in 285 Posts
    Rep Power
    148

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    Sorry im not reading all the poss but do your switchs support filtering multicasts?

    Our HP procurve ones do so i am able to image as much as i want without any/much effect on the network

  10. #10

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    8,798
    Thank Post
    351
    Thanked 1,274 Times in 870 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1126

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    Quote Originally Posted by j17sparky
    Sorry im not reading all the poss but do your switchs support filtering multicasts?

    Our HP procurve ones do so i am able to image as much as i want without any/much effect on the network
    Unfortunately we use 3Com (I would prefer Cisco). That aside looking at the switches I can see in Device view:

    Bridge/Multicast Filter/IGMP/Snoop Mode

    IGMP Multicast Filtering is enabled. I suspect this is true for all of the switches, because apart form giving them an IP address and naming them very little other configuration has been done to them, so I supsect this is a default setting. However this is 3Com I am dealing with so I will do some more checking (on more switches)

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newhaven
    Posts
    5
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Station Imaging And Network Traffic Saturation

    I have the same problem, you are not along friend

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Radio Station onto network
    By Ste_Harve in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21st November 2007, 01:43 PM
  2. Unessasary network traffic from printers.
    By tosca925 in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14th August 2007, 10:10 PM
  3. Procurve network backbone saturation
    By meastaugh1 in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13th January 2007, 01:15 PM
  4. Imaging onto network
    By witch in forum Hardware
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10th July 2006, 12:04 PM
  5. Analyse Network Traffic
    By SpuffMonkey in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 15th January 2006, 06:18 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •