Wireless Networks Thread, Underground ethernet cables between buildings in Technical; I seem to remember reading on here that there are regulations surrounding using copper cables. Am i imagining things or ...
-
12th November 2008, 12:55 PM #1 Underground ethernet cables between buildings
I seem to remember reading on here that there are regulations surrounding using copper cables. Am i imagining things or are there? Any advice, links to government sites etc
The problem is we already have copper cables run between 2 buildings from years ago. 2 out of the 3 have recently failed, one last night. We also had a power cut last night - coincidence?
I have no idea what was done when fitting the cables, whether an electrician was consulted etc etc as it was around 6 years ago, well before i started.
:beer:
Last edited by j17sparky; 12th November 2008 at 01:19 PM.
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
12th November 2008, 01:12 PM #2 Hi j17sparky,
Can I start by asking what you are trying to achieve here? Networking two buildings together?
If so have you considered doing this over Wi-Fi?
Ruckus wireless access points use technology called meshing, which literally meshes two or more access points together. I have set this up with a few clients and they love it.
However you may be trying to achieve something else, just thought i'd put the thought out there.
If you would like to talk more about this you can contact me on 07595718705.
I am on the road but will be in a meeting from 2.30 - 4pm
Kind Regards
Stuart
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:18 PM #3 See first post ta. Thanks for the input and we may have to consider wireless if the problem does prove to be underground as id just love to ask the HT for money to dig up the school playground! lol
:beer:
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:21 PM #4 It's buried in the Building Regulations somewhere. I confess I have looked but have been unable to locate the exact section. Basically you are not allowed to connect buildings together with electrically conductive material. This obviously includes Cat6.
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:22 PM #5 Sounds great,
If you get to do it please post some pictures so we can all have a laugh 
Rgrds
Stu
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:29 PM #6 How far are the buildings apart? we have ours connected with fibre optic cable tied to a catenary(30+ metre), also worked out very cheap using pre terminated fibre cables and stringing the catenary is'nt rocket sience.
might give you another angle to look at
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:40 PM #7 The discussion over copper cables being used underground is around the differing ground potential that the buildings could have. What about replacing with fibre?
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:43 PM #8 Also consider a laser link, microwave or ethernet over power.
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:47 PM #9 Cheers so far people.
So geoff, do you think its against regulations then? Not that im doubting you but ive seen quite alot about armored cable specifically for underground applications. Obviously this doesnt mean it has to be inter-building but you are the first person i have found who has said in black and white "it is not allowed". Maybe its a newist regulation?
Just dont want to be going to SMT and telling them we need rid of the copper when we dont.

Originally Posted by
webman
The discussion over copper cables being used underground is around the differing ground potential that the buildings could have. What about replacing with fibre?
In a perfect world id love to. Depending on where things terminate we might actually be lucky to get a fibre pulled through, we'll see. We've actually got most of the equipment already but we have no money. Got spare gbics on the nearest core switch, and we've got a couple of spare switches going. All we'll need is the fibre running and terminating, and 2 fibre modules.
Wireless - maybe it will be better now but the reason copper was installed was because too much interfearance was coming from the boiler house to get a stable connection.
Ethernet over power - most likely will have the same problems as above.
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:49 PM #10 
Originally Posted by
j17sparky
In a perfect world id love to. Depending on where things terminate we might actually be lucky to get a fibre pulled through, we'll see. We've actually got most of the equipment already but we have no money. Got spare gbics on the nearest core switch, and we've got a couple of spare switches going. All we'll need is the fibre running and terminating, and 2 fibre modules.
I understand. If the pipe's big enough you could buy it pre-terminated.
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:50 PM #11 if you already have copper in ducting underground then it should be reasonably easy to tie a length of fibre to the copper wire and use the copper wire to pull the fibre through
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:51 PM #12 We have a fibre cable at our school between our two buildings - no problems at all. It was supposed to be installed underground, but the school decided not to do it as it would be too expensive to fix if it broke.
We also have a CAT5e cable through a caternary to one of our mobile huts. I don't think that there is anything stopping that?
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:51 PM #13
So geoff, do you think its against regulations then? Not that im doubting you but ive seen quite alot about armored cable specifically for underground applications. Obviously this doesnt mean it has to be inter-building but you are the first person i have found who has said in black and white "it is not allowed". Maybe its a newist regulation?
Building regulations aren't really my area of expertise and are hardly 'concise'. Like I said, I know about this because our LEA pulled us up on it here. We have a science block connected via Ethernet cable.
webmans point about ground loops is correct. I've seen the same issue at a nearby primary school. It knocks out their main switch on a regular basis.
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:52 PM #14 
Originally Posted by
button_ripple
We have a fibre cable at our school between our two buildings - no problems at all. It was supposed to be installed underground, but the school decided not to do it as it would be too expensive to fix if it broke.
not if you put it in ducting and leave a rope in there. Cheaper than that cherrypicker
-
-
12th November 2008, 01:55 PM #15
We also have a CAT5e cable through a caternary to one of our mobile huts. I don't think that there is anything stopping that?
All external building connections should be non-conducting. eg fibre, wifi, etc.
Also with a caternary, you have to watch the height, we can't use them for some building because the section of playground are counted as a 'roadway' for the purposes of getting a fire engine round the site. There's a minimum height requirement (basically about 5m) which is impossible to reach from a single storey building (It's in the Building Regulations and the Highways Act apparently) safely.
-
SHARE: 
Similar Threads
-
By YorkshireTechie in forum Wireless Networks
Replies: 32
Last Post: 16th June 2008, 03:46 PM
-
By eduabncs in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
Replies: 6
Last Post: 31st August 2007, 11:15 PM
-
By callumtuckey in forum General Chat
Replies: 17
Last Post: 12th June 2007, 09:10 AM
-
By webman in forum General Chat
Replies: 3
Last Post: 5th June 2006, 11:56 AM
-
By Dos_Box in forum General EduGeek News/Announcements
Replies: 9
Last Post: 16th December 2005, 10:17 AM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules