Wireless Networks Thread, Excessive CRC/Alignment Errors in Technical; I've got 22 HP dc7800, 4 being used by admin connected to a Procurve 2450 and the rest connected to ...
24th October 2008, 12:39 PM #1
Excessive CRC/Alignment Errors
I've got 22 HP dc7800, 4 being used by admin connected to a Procurve 2450 and the rest connected to a Procurve 5406zl.
I'm getting lots of Excessive CRC/Alignment Errors and the switchs are also reporting lots of packet errors. The machines seem to be connecting without any issues.
Cabling is mostly new, we don't seem to have similar issues with other equipment attached to the same cabling.
24th October 2008, 02:21 PM #2
I've been having similar issues in a few rooms for over a year and a half now. Performance across the network isn't affected and as a result it has become one of the very low priority jobs to look at.
One or two errors have gone away as I've replaced seemingly unrelated cables but the odd error still appears from time to time.
24th October 2008, 02:58 PM #3
Try manually setting the switch port and the network card to 100M/b full duplex as quite often these are casued by negotiation problems. You could also try updating nic drivers (try the ones off Intel rather than HP if you are on the latest HP drivers).
It can also be interference on the cable run which some network cards cope with better than others, but you need someone with a posh Fluke tester to find that.
As others have said, unless this is causing network issues its not really worth bothering about.
24th October 2008, 03:42 PM #4
Tried forcing them both to gigabit and 100mb. I've tried the latest HP drivers, but giving the generic Intel ones a go is something I'll try.
Originally Posted by teejay
25th October 2008, 10:27 AM #5
These types of error are usually caused by bad termination in the cables, faulty NICs or cable length has exceeded the recommedede for cat5e and cat 6 its 100m so make sure that from one end to another it is not more than 100m. Also if its fibre then i would check the fibre modules (transcievers) as these can also go bad and you see this type of issues.
Originally Posted by K.C.Leblanc
Try the following:
- Check the duplex and speed of the link
- change the cables i.e. patch leads
- change the fibre patch leads and the module if its possible.
- Change the switch port and plug the patch lead into another port to eliminate faulty port on the switch
- If you have any testers then meaure the length of the cable
Also make sure that you clear the counters on the switches or at least note down the current counters for CRC errors, Alignment errors etc so you can compare after swapping the cables etc.
Its a process of elimination i'm afraid.
25th October 2008, 11:38 AM #6
I'm very much doubting faulty nics, because it's occurring on 20 odd new machines. The termination is a nagging concern, most of these machines are on new cabling that was installed over the summer, I've done a bit of testing with a dumb tester. Anyone know if it's possible to hire network testing kit.
Originally Posted by ashok
Total length isn't going to be an issue, the runs arn't even 25 meters.
25th October 2008, 12:46 PM #7
I would check how far they have untwisted the internal cores of the cables at each end where they have wired them in. They should have untwisted as little as possible as it is the twisting that sheilds it from interfearence. If it is untwisted too far the live cores will act like little arials happily broadcasting rubbish that is most likely to be picked up by an 'arial' of a simmilar size in close proximity - like in a cabinet or wall socket.
If this is the case they will happily sit transmitting rubbish to each other untill they are reterminated with minimal untwisting.
By powdarrmonkey in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
Last Post: 21st July 2008, 07:31 PM
By DMcCoy in forum Hardware
Last Post: 4th February 2008, 12:07 PM
By Scruff in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 16th October 2007, 06:08 PM
By tosca925 in forum Windows
Last Post: 2nd July 2007, 03:27 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)