+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25
Wireless Networks Thread, Why has our new server got two network ports in Technical; If you team the two ports and plug each port into a different switch it will give you abit of ...
  1. #16

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    15,936
    Thank Post
    886
    Thanked 1,692 Times in 1,471 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    446
    If you team the two ports and plug each port into a different switch it will give you abit of redundancy incase one switch dies, you another to fall back on.

  2. Thanks to FN-GM from:

    speckytecky (10th June 2008)

  3. #17

    maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    3,051
    Thank Post
    209
    Thanked 427 Times in 307 Posts
    Rep Power
    144
    Our storage server is a bit overkill, we have 4 HP network cards teamed in it, until recently it was just 2. It does have storage for all our users doucments, and all the shared areas on it, so the extra bandwidth can't do it any harm.

    The HP network teaming tool is very good, most manufacturers also to their own variations so it's worth looking for them if they exist for your network cards, rather than using the built in Windows options in my opinion.

    Mike.

  4. Thanks to maniac from:

    speckytecky (10th June 2008)

  5. #18


    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Rural heck
    Posts
    2,662
    Thank Post
    120
    Thanked 434 Times in 353 Posts
    Rep Power
    126
    Just check that they are both network cards. Some servers (most of our HPs) have an additional managment port that connects to a web server built into the motherboard, lets you do hard reboots etc. remotely.

  6. #19

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    56
    Thank Post
    33
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    13
    On our server, we have 1 network port for external (Internet) traffic and the other for internal (network) traffic.

  7. Thanks to AndyD from:

    speckytecky (11th June 2008)

  8. #20

    maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    3,051
    Thank Post
    209
    Thanked 427 Times in 307 Posts
    Rep Power
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by K.C.Leblanc View Post
    Just check that they are both network cards. Some servers (most of our HPs) have an additional managment port that connects to a web server built into the motherboard, lets you do hard reboots etc. remotely.
    Goold old ILO on the HP servers has saved me a fair few times when I've accidently gone to shutdown insted of restart when working on a server remotely. I just wish you didn't have to purchase a licence to get the full functionality Still just the ability to operate the power button remotely is a real bonus!

    Mike.

  9. Thanks to maniac from:

    speckytecky (11th June 2008)

  10. #21

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,154
    Thank Post
    114
    Thanked 527 Times in 450 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    123
    Quote Originally Posted by Domino View Post
    i think there's confusion there, srochford obviously thought you meant

    "two network ports aren't much good for windows servers"

    when you meant
    "this article is about linux.."

    Indeed - that'll teach me to read things too quickly :-)

  11. Thanks to srochford from:

    speckytecky (11th June 2008)

  12. #22
    torledo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,928
    Thank Post
    168
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts
    Rep Power
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by maniac View Post
    Goold old ILO on the HP servers has saved me a fair few times when I've accidently gone to shutdown insted of restart when working on a server remotely. I just wish you didn't have to purchase a licence to get the full functionality Still just the ability to operate the power button remotely is a real bonus!

    Mike.
    yeah, i only discovered that the other day...iLO advanced for proliant servers.
    IBM make a point about users not having to license for advanced LOM features, but then you have to order a RSA II slimline card to get a fully featured LOM experience on some ibm servers, so IBM charge for it in hardware and HP charge for it in feature activation - not much difference really. The only ones that don't add an iLO 'tax' for full functionality are Sun, and those who've used the iLO on Sun X4x00's say it's the best LOM implementation out of all the vendors. I've only used DRAC so i can't comment.

    Normally the BMC/iLO port is clearly defined, on Dell servers it's a little spanner icon if you've order the option the DRAC option, suns standar ELO port on it's X2x00's just says 'net mgmt'

    out of interest what feature(s) did you require of the iLO advanced that weren't available with the standard iLO on the proliant ? Surely the standard iLO let's you do basic stuff like remote power on.

  13. Thanks to torledo from:

    speckytecky (11th June 2008)

  14. #23
    ahuxham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,122
    Thank Post
    76
    Thanked 138 Times in 109 Posts
    Rep Power
    30
    On a linux machine, specifically Squid Proxy.


    Two is ideal, one for inbound/outbound traffic from lan, and the other for inbound/outbound traffic from the Internet.


    So the internet is theoretically never connected to the lan. The middle man and IPtables tell it what to-do with certain traffic. Good for a easy "load balance"

  15. #24

    Dos_Box's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    9,909
    Thank Post
    596
    Thanked 2,164 Times in 989 Posts
    Blog Entries
    23
    Rep Power
    628
    I use one for the LAN and one for the iSCSI SAN per server. 2 Ports good.

  16. #25

    maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    3,051
    Thank Post
    209
    Thanked 427 Times in 307 Posts
    Rep Power
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by torledo View Post
    out of interest what feature(s) did you require of the iLO advanced that weren't available with the standard iLO on the proliant ? Surely the standard iLO let's you do basic stuff like remote power on.

    I don't really need the extra functionality, the only bit I really use is the powerbutton control, but the full console control of the machine from within iLO would be handy. However terminal services will suffice for my needs as it's not worth the extra expence for the number of times it is likely to be used.

    Mike.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Switches... 24 or 48 ports?
    By gshaw in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21st May 2008, 03:34 PM
  2. Windows 2003 Server R2 - No printer ports !!
    By pmassingham in forum Windows
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 1st September 2006, 03:16 PM
  3. Virtual Server 2005 R2 kills server network connection
    By ajbritton in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31st August 2006, 06:19 AM
  4. Opening ports Server 2003 R2
    By edie209 in forum Windows
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 23rd June 2006, 02:47 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •