Wireless Networks Thread, connectivity solution in Technical; Can someone recomend me a system to connect 2 blocks to our main building. At a guess I would say ...
18th March 2008, 12:37 PM #1
Can someone recomend me a system to connect 2 blocks to our main building. At a guess I would say that the distance between the server room and the switches in both buildings is over 100m, so I either have 1Gb fibre or radio link to use. I was looking at getting quotes for fibre, but the SBM has asked if we can use radio links because she doesn't like cables every where.
My main questions are, what is the speed I would be able to get out of a radio link? would it be 1Gb or am I hoping for too much?
And most importantly, which would be the cheapest option? Which is most reliable?
18th March 2008, 12:54 PM #2
you can buy lasers...
we have a 100mb one, but you can get gig ones now... takes a bit of aligning and as long as you can see one building from the other seem to do the job.
We have one... did work once, but because nobody has used it in the last 2 years we have failed to see when it broke.
18th March 2008, 01:14 PM #3
It depends on what you have in the remote blocks... a couple of PCs would not warrant a laser link but radio would not provide sufficient bandwidth unless you went for microwave - which is costly again.
Ideally, you want fibre though because it is more cost effective in the long run - taking into account maintenance on external equipment and time realigning lasers/antennae after you kids boot a football at it!
18th March 2008, 01:15 PM #4
I wouldn't use wi-fi to connect switches in various buildings. Fastest wi-fi is a theoretical 108Mb/s I believe. Transmission rate decreases with range and other factors such as trees and walls. 2.4Ghz frequency that wi-fi uses is severely affected by water. You'd have to use directional antennas too and some special routers to increase security and transmission range. It's possible to use a 5.4Ghz frequency (20x better water penetration) but that depends on getting a licence from Ofcom. Antenna's also make a good target - for kids and for lightning.
I would recommend fibre as it's faster and more reliable. It will also allow for future expansion. It may cost more than wi-fi solution, but it's the best way to go. And tell your SBM that you don't just leave fibre cables lying around - repairing a cable is extremely expensive and sometimes cheaper to just replace it if it's not too long - so most places will bury it or use an existing conduit. We use fibre between all our networked buildings.
Try these sites for more info on wi-fi if you want:
I've looked at lasers too, but they're extremely expensive:
take a look at the GeoDesy stuff...
18th March 2008, 01:45 PM #5
Fibre all they way, if you dont want to see the cable, dig a trench and hide them... costs more than flying but then she won't see the cable
18th March 2008, 01:57 PM #6
i think it would be really good to have a section in the wiki on ptp/ptmp wireless connectivity options as they've been a couple of queries recently about connectnig disparate buildings....plus there's a lot of confusion, well in my head atleast.
Originally Posted by Gerry
I hear about 4.9, 5.4 and 5.8 ghz frequenzies mentioned for outdoor RF options but what's the difference between these and the various 802.11a bands, and are 5.4 and 5.8 not in unlicensed spectrum ? Where is the best source of information at what frequencies are available for a particular usage.
18th March 2008, 04:38 PM #7
Thanks for the info guys, looks like it's fibre (which is what I was hoping for anyway).
By boomam in forum Windows
Last Post: 6th March 2008, 01:23 PM
By firefox_2006 in forum Hardware
Last Post: 25th October 2007, 01:42 PM
By Samson in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 2nd October 2007, 10:08 PM
By mudcow007 in forum Windows
Last Post: 29th May 2007, 02:17 PM
By speckytecky in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 2nd September 2006, 07:41 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)