Wireless Networks Thread, Stackable Switches - why is it better? in Technical; Looking at this thread wouldn't it have been better to just have the core switch loaded with the extra Copper ...
9th February 2009, 02:53 PM #16
Looking at this thread wouldn't it have been better to just have the core switch loaded with the extra Copper ports he'd have needed then the connection speed si the backplane speed anyway which is usually considerably higher than anything but several trunked 10gb fibre ports (I know Extreme, Cisco and Foundry are much faster than this)? Just seems a little strange to have a core switch and then add several switches below if you can get a core with enough upgrade capacity why not use it?
20th February 2009, 03:51 PM #17
Ideally I think you would do the above as long as the devices you're connecting all lead back to the same comms cabinet/patch panel location.
Originally Posted by wesleyw
Most of the PCs in our school are in different buildings from where the core switch/cabinet is located with fibre links connecting them (between seperate buildings) hence the need for a core and several 'edge' switches. I'm sure a lot of other places will be in the same situation.
Many of the modular switches that take substantial numbers of fibre/ethernet connections are also fairly expensive so if funds are limited it might be cheaper to buy a stack of several lower cost switches.
Last edited by flyinghaggis; 20th February 2009 at 03:55 PM.
By mmoseley in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 1st June 2007, 09:33 AM
By tosca925 in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 6th February 2007, 10:10 AM
By wesleyw in forum General Chat
Last Post: 30th January 2007, 11:34 AM
By Norphy in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 15th January 2007, 07:21 PM
By pickman in forum Hardware
Last Post: 17th November 2005, 01:07 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)